Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $36,642 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on

a return to penal times?

By Diogenes (articles ) | Dec 12, 2009

The CNS reports that an antidiscrimination statute under consideration in Britain could make it unlawful for the Catholic Church to require that her priests be male and celibate.

The Catholic bishops of England and Wales said they could be at risk of prosecution under a proposed law unless they accept women, sexually active gays and transsexuals as candidates to the priesthood. They made their claims in a briefing for Catholic members of the House of Lords, Britain's upper political chamber, ahead of a scheduled Dec. 15 debate on the Equality Bill, which aims to stamp out discrimination in the workplace.


According to the briefing, a copy of which was obtained by Catholic News Service Dec. 8, the government definition will, in effect, make it "unlawful to require a Catholic priest to be male, unmarried or not in a civil partnership, etc., since no priest would be able to demonstrate that their time was wholly or mainly spent either leading liturgy or promoting and explaining doctrine."

It's tough to know what degree of alarm is justified here. The text of the proposal is troubling, but much depends on the concrete circumstances of enforcement, whether the law could or would in fact be used against the Church -- to return faithful Catholics to penal times, in effect. On the one hand we don't want to scream that the sky is falling when it isn't, on the other hand we'd be fools to deny that not only militant secularists but many of our co-religionists earnestly want the heavens to tumble and would press for the law's strictest possible enforcement so as to force the Church to capitulate.

Yet the real battle is not over a "clerical exemption" for Catholics but over the justice of discrimination full stop. The Church teaches that there are cases in which it is permissible and cases in which it is obligatory to discriminate. The CDF sounded the call to arms seventeen years ago: "Where a matter of the common good is concerned, it is inappropriate for Church authorities to endorse or remain neutral toward adverse legislation even if it grants exceptions to Church organizations and institutions." By and large the bishops -- not only in Britain -- failed to rally and fight for this ground. Having ceded the main pass to the Church's adversaries, they can hardly be shocked to learn that the war has moved beneath their own windows.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($124,732 to go):
$150,000.00 $25,268.34
83% 17%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 4 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Patricia - Dec. 16, 2009 1:59 PM ET USA

    Interesting the Brits are always the Brits

  • Posted by: c_truelove7100 - Dec. 15, 2009 9:34 PM ET USA

    Well, if they do that, are they going to make laws that force FIFA to allow children to play professional soccer? After all, those children are being discriminated against. Poor children . . . not being allowed to play professional sports.

  • Posted by: alencon - Dec. 15, 2009 9:11 AM ET USA

    If I may deviate and do an end around on this topic, I'll take the same quote highlighted by Minnesota Mary and extrapolate it to the marriage problem. If the Church and bishops rallied to the defense of marriage when no-fault divorce was being forced upon everyone and stood up for the sacrament - we wouldn't even be discussing homosexual unions in this day and age. And that's why though we should be fighting against gay marriage, we should also be fighting for real marriage with equal fervor.

  • Posted by: Minnesota Mary - Dec. 14, 2009 11:32 PM ET USA

    "By and large the bishops--not only in Britain--failed to rally and fight for this ground. Having ceded the main pass to the Church's adversaries, they can hardly be shocked to learn that the war has moved beneath their windows." The above statement says it all. Some bishops and priests have been anxiously waiting for the State to step in and force these changes on the Church since they, themselves, couldn't get the Church to make these ordinations. Well, they can go on waiting.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on

Recent Catholic Commentary

Could respect for the papacy mean resisting the Pope? 5 hours ago
The Church Moves On, Slowly October 24
Is Cardinal Kasper losing his grip? October 24
The Pope is not the problem October 23
Do not confuse sacramental discipline and Catholic doctrine. October 23

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6