Click here to advertise on


By Diogenes (articles ) | Jan 19, 2009

 Oh, never mind the US Senate. Why not move straight to immediate canonization? That's the net effect-- quite obviously the desired effect, anyway-- of a front-page story in the New York Times about the aspirations of Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg. As an example of out-of-control, over-the-top, objectivity-be-damned journalism, you'll have trouble matching this fawning tribute.

Now, however, Ms. Kennedy, having offered herself as a candidate to replace Hillary Rodham Clinton as New York’s junior senator, stands poised to surrender her zealously guarded privacy and genteel civic involvement to dive headlong into the mosh pit of New York politics.

She has offered herself. She is surrendering her cherished privacy. Such a spirit of sacrifice! The entire world will benefit, needless to say, if Caroline becomes the latest in a line of Senators Kennedy. That's implicit; no need to explain. 

The Times catches us to the would-be Senator as she arrives at an award ceremony. During campaign season, every aspiring office-seeker seeks out just such public events, as opportunities to gain a bit more publicity. But in this case, the coverage is light. "There were no television cameras in Mott Haven that day," the Times reports. That's too bad. The candidate's advance-publicity team didn't get the desired coverage. 

But wait; the New York Times was there, and that's nothing to sniff at. There are other people who would like to be appointed as the next US Senator from New York. We don't know what they were doing that day; they didn't get front-page coverage. Come to think of it, we can't even remember the names of those other Senate aspirants. But we can remember the name Kennedy, and that's why the name Schlossberg has disappeared from public view.

Raised to tend her family legacy but not to trade on it, ...

[sorry about that cough]

... Ms. Kennedy has struggled to make the case that she is motivated by the Kennedy ethic of public service and not by any sense of entitlement.

So there's the Kennedy ethic on one hand, the sense of entitlement on the other. Sorry; I don't see the difference.




An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our April expenses ($25,943 to go):
$35,000.00 $9,056.70
74% 26%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Church Fathers: The Other Greek Apologists 10 hours ago
Mysteries, again and again! April 17
Tips for getting comfortable with evangelization April 17
The Shroud of Turin on Display (and an odd canonical case against it) April 16
The Vatican says the LCWR is acting Catholic. And that's news. April 16

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope challenges world leaders' silence on persecution of Christians CWN - April 6
Pope outlines plans for the extraordinary jubilee of mercy CWN - April 13
Vatican completes doctrinal assessment of Leadership Conference of Women Religious CWN - April 16