By Diogenes (articles ) | Sep 26, 2007
In an op-ed column for the San Diego Union Tribune, Bishop Salvatore Cordileone, an auxiliary of the San Diego diocese, offers some thoughts on what Catholics might have learned from the sex-abuse scandal.
Could I add a few more items that seem to have escaped the bishop's attention?
- There are many American bishops still alive, and many still functioning as diocesan ordinaries even today, despite clear evidence that they obstructed justice and in many cases continue to do so. Governor Keating made this point when he resigned from the National Review Board. Cardinal Mahony has been making the point-- by example, I mean-- ever since.
- With the exception of Cardinal Law, no American bishops have been persuaded to step down because of their malfeasance in handling abusive priests. Bishop John McCormack, thoroughly implicated in the scandal that brought down Law, remains at the head of the Manchester, New Hampshire diocese.
- The John Jay report, cited by Bishop Cordileone for its "scientifically verified data," failed to show due diligence in the following areas:
- It failed to list the rate of abuse among priests from different dioceses, priests trained in different seminaries, and priests led by different bishops. In other words the data in the report tar all bishops, dioceses, and seminaries with the same brush, while letting the most conspicuous failures escape notice.
- The report took note of the fact that most abuse victims were teenage boys, but did not pursue the clear connection between sexual abuse and homosexuality. Bishop Cordileone does the same.
- The John Jay report said nothing about the results achieved by the treatment centers to which troubled priests were sent. There is a wealth of data in the files of those centers, as yet unexplored. And since the centers were obviously not successful in predicting the future behavior of abusive priests, a critical look at their methodology is warranted. We're still waiting.
- Bishop Cordileone notes that "only 3.3% [of victims] were abused in more than one diocese." Therefore he concludes, citing a John Jay investigator: "It is clear that transferring priests [among dioceses] with allegations of child sexual abuse was not a general response to the problem, and was limited to a finite number of cases." It's nice to know that the number is finite. But notice those words in brackets: "among dioceses." True, it was not the "general response" to transfer a predator to another diocese. But it was the standard response to transfer an abusive priest to another parish within the same diocese.
- Since the scandal erupted, we have been waiting for brave bishops to call for public acts of confession and repentance, including voluntary resignation of those who proved unworthy of pastoral leadership. Instead we have seen a circling of the wagons. Bishop Bruskewitz, it's true, has admitted that the real problem is a lack of episcopal leadership. Ironically it is Bruskewitz who is criticized for his refusal to go along with the flawed process of an "audit" that measures symptoms but ignores the disease.
The "scientifically verified data" do not resolve what is, in the final analysis, a spiritual problem.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($33,084 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Sep. 27, 2007 1:13 AM ET USA
There is nothing that can be done to correct the mistakes in chooing bishops by previous popes. We can hope that B16 is a better judge of worthiness that his predessor. Reassignment of some incompetent bishops, however, is an option B16 possesses. Los Angeles can be split into more than one diocese. Orange needs help,too. In the East we are faced with the job of replacing quite a few theological dimwits.
Posted by: -
Sep. 26, 2007 10:51 PM ET USA
In that awful day of the Last Judgement, when all the bishops will be called to give account of their pastoral duties, will they try the same obtuse obnubilations of today?
Posted by: -
Sep. 26, 2007 8:28 PM ET USA
2 points: 1 a lot of consensual homosexual activity was going on in many dioceses. A reliable source told me a number in just one diocese was about one hundred, huge majority of them priests. Some of that still goes on. 2 the “sexual abuse crisis” might have never been discovered if the civil authorities had not stepped in. The State, (and yes, the money-hungry lawyers) NOT bishops uncovered and helped to clean up this dirt. Whose duty is it?
Posted by: -
Sep. 26, 2007 7:18 PM ET USA
Bishop Bruskewitz is excatly on target when he cites the "lack of episcopal leadership". Measuring the symptoms while ignoring the disease is a crucial flaw the bishops themselves built into the Dallas Charter. They also skillfully left out any possible punishment for themselves for abuses and failures to correct the problems in their own dioceses. Do we really "need" more statistics? The problems can be addressed and corrected without another study or audit--prayer and fasting!!!
Posted by: -
Sep. 26, 2007 5:55 PM ET USA
Bishop Cordileone's op ed column is reminiscent of so many talks/comments I have heard from other clergy as well. There is a truly sickening common thread. That thread is a constant allusion to "unfair" media attention on Catholic priests, who, they suggest are not as bad as some others. That makes it better? And this from a bishop ordained in the line of Peter in the one true Church founded by Jesus Christ. Yes, it is a spiritual problem. We must pray constantly.
Posted by: -
Sep. 26, 2007 2:44 PM ET USA
I reminded of that old saw: figures don’t lie, but liars figure. This enabler-bishop writes nearly 1,400 words about a sex-abuse scandal in which more than 80% of the victims were young males and doesn’t once pen the word “homosexual.” Instead of being fascinated with the alliteration of “pedophile priest,” this fellow should be sickened by the reality of “homosexual priest.” If ever there was proof that a Lavender Mafia exists in the clerical ranks, this bishop is it.