URGENT! Only 3 days left! We must still match $4,895 to win a $25,400 Challenge Grant! Can you help?
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

numbers game

By Diogenes (articles ) | Mar 09, 2007

If you followed the news coverage of the Discovery Channel special, "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," you know that the producers cited a statistical analysis, claiming that there was only an infinitesimal probability that another Jewish family tomb would show the same names as the ones found in what was allegedly the tomb of Jesus' family. You might have wondered how those statistics were calculated.

The "Numbers Guy" in the Wall Street Journal wondered, too. So he contacted the University of Toronto statistician who furnished the figures. It turns out that-- surprise!-- the statistician began his calculations with the assumptions that the filmmakers gave him: that "Mariamene" was an unusual name referring to Mary Magdalen, rather than a variation on the very common "Mary;" that "Yose" was an unusual name rather than a form of the popular "Yosef;" and so on. Without those assumptions, the connection between this tomb in Jerusalem and the family of Jesus would have been "statistically not significant."

"When I was doing the calculation, I was naively unaware of the extent to which the filmmakers might be depending on the ultimate result of it," the Toronto professor told the Journal. "I did carry out the calculation in every good faith."

In short, the calculations were accurate. The data that went into the calculations... Well, you know the old principle of data analysis by computers: Garbage in, garbage out.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($4,895 to go):
$25,400.00 $20,504.71
19% 81%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 5 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Mar. 09, 2007 6:34 PM ET USA

    I heard Fr Mitch Pacwa this week citing Chesterton's remark about statistics: some people use stats pretty much like a drunk on the streets would use a lamp-post - for support, not for illumination.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 09, 2007 5:54 PM ET USA

    It proves another axiom: Figures can lie and liars can figure.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 09, 2007 11:58 AM ET USA

    An article on all this in the Canadian newsmagazine Macleans made it sound like he was an integral "team member", but he described his methodology and I thought, either this guy is an "ideological" mathematician (really, "mathematician"), or else he isn't as "integral" as he's been painted (and is being used). 'Cause if he'd been an integral team member, he'd have known more about the names . . . People wouldn't be nearly as swindled by stuff like this if they read, e.g., Josephus.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 09, 2007 11:48 AM ET USA

    You mean the left would fudge data!

  • Posted by: - Mar. 09, 2007 9:02 AM ET USA

    Garbage In, Garbage Out: It works for ICEL.

Matching Campaign
Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

What's wrong with these pictures? 0 hours ago
What can we learn from the dignity of military services? 1 hours ago
Urgent! We need extra financial support between now and May 24th. 7 hours ago
Was Lewis “basically Catholic”? 22 hours ago
Reading The Diary of a Country Priest: Scandal May 20

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days