Last February, we received 607 gifts, but fell short. This year we need 700. We have 3 to go—donate now!
Click here to advertise on

mystery solved

By Diogenes (articles ) | Dec 23, 2005

And could you tell us please how the inadvertence occurred?

The problem came about because America's editors only saw the ad in black and white before it was published, and the condom was not as evident, according to the magazine's associate editor, Rev. James Martin. ...

Another issue may be Catholic priests' unfamiliarity with what condoms look like. "We're Jesuits," Martin said. "I don't think you could have found anyone in the editors' room who has seen a condom."

Thank you. That explains it.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our February expenses ($6,729 to go):
$35,000.00 $28,270.54
19% 81%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 9 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Fr. William - Dec. 27, 2005 8:58 PM ET USA

    As a former journalist, working as an editor & writer for newspapers/magazines, I can objectively state that "Father" James Martin has lied. Just reading the copy from the ad itself would tell any editor that there was a serious problem. The photo, in black & white or color, clearly shows the condom covering. At least five individuals would have opportunities to question the ad: the ad person; copy editor; layout editor; associate editor; & managing editor. May the magazine be shut down.

  • Posted by: AveMaria580 - Dec. 27, 2005 8:44 PM ET USA

    This is a little frightening. With all the gays that apparently infest the Jesuits one would hope they would make a point of knowing what a condom looks like. If they are condom ignorant, they may well be HIV positive.

  • Posted by: parochus - Dec. 24, 2005 12:40 AM ET USA

    Not even on a banana during sex-ed?

  • Posted by: Vincit omnia amor - Dec. 23, 2005 10:13 PM ET USA

    ALSO, as reported in the NCR regarding Fr. Reese's resignation (America's former EDITOR) : "Over the course of a five-year exchange between the doctrinal congregation and the Jesuits, the Vatican congregation had raised objections to various editorial choices at America under Reese’s leadership, including...An essay exploring moral arguments for the approval of CONDOMS in the context of HIV/AIDS." Hey, they're Jesuits! AND now they know what a condom looks B&W and full color.

  • Posted by: Vincit omnia amor - Dec. 23, 2005 10:09 PM ET USA

    it's as plain as "black & white:" the "Extra Virgin" wasn't a tip off? anyway, this excuse ranks right up there with "the dog ate my homework." NB- From the pages of "America" magazine: "Roman Theologians Say Condom Use O.K. in Certain Cases" AND "Tolerant Signals: The Vatican's New Insights on Condoms for HIV Prevention." I guess one can know what a condom is (and support there use) without knowing what one looks like????

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Dec. 23, 2005 9:01 PM ET USA

    Did you catch that "no one in the editor's room" Who is speaking? The assistant editor. ROFL.

  • Posted by: Granny - Dec. 23, 2005 4:59 PM ET USA

    Funny! In the 50's my 90+ Jesuit Medical Ethics Prof at a big city Jesuit Univ brought in jellies, creams, diaphragms, and, condoms to show 50women how they were thought to work and why they did not work and why the church said it was wrong to use them. He pulled them from the deep pockets of his cassock,put them on the desk one by one.Dead silence for 50 min: rapt attention. Afterwards we said we were grateful he did not have to cross the busy street outside to get home.Fr.M missed this class?

  • Posted by: - Dec. 23, 2005 2:31 PM ET USA

    I'm tempted to a cynical response - very, very tempted. But no, it's Christmas. Must...Resist...Temptation...

  • Posted by: - Dec. 23, 2005 2:03 PM ET USA

    Fr. Martin has told a lie.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Two good publishers, six new books for Lent 18 hours ago
Another awkward 'clarification' from the Vatican February 25
Former Israeli ambassador explains how to make 'two-state solution' realistic February 25
Solidarity Campaign: Going well, thanks! And how can you help? February 25
Considering the World of Film February 24

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis to address Congress in joint session in September CWN - February 5