Your gift counts double until 5/31: $32,085 to go in our Easter Campaign. Please help now!
 Off the Record

consequences

By Fr. Paul Mankowski, S.J. (articles ) | May 04, 2003 4:09 AM

One summer Sunday in 1979:

She stepped up to the makeshift altar, made a sign of the cross, and began to say the liturgy. She lifted bread and, for the first time in earnest, uttered the words, "This is my body." Afterward, the community's regular priest -- whom the Catholic Church had removed from ministry when he married -- told her: "Judy, you have been ordained. Any other ceremony would only confirm it. Some in the group had qualms, however. They debated for nine months before voting to permit Heffernan to submit to an ordination ceremony.

On May 11, 1980, a Jesuit priest laid hands on her head before the community, and performed the ordination rite canonically done by Roman Catholic bishops.

No, Judy, you are not ordained. The bread you declaim over remains bread. The sins you shrive still bind the penitent. The Jesuit who laid hands on your head no more effected an ordination than a six-year-old playing Mass in his bedroom confects the Eucharist. This, at any rate, is the Catholic belief about Catholic belief.

You were voted into the job by your "group." Think about what that means. Either they have ceased to believe in consecration and absolution full stop (and simply prefer to take their bread and encouragement from you than from Father O'Halloran), or they have ceased to believe that Holy Orders confer any sacramental powers at all -- any power, i.e., that can't be ginned up by a half-dozen folks with a big red book and a candle.

By your actions you have proclaimed your denial of the infallibility of the Church. Well, is your group fallible or infallible? If infallible, how can you know it? If fallible, then think about the responsibility you have taken on yourself: the eternal destiny of souls which, henceforth separated from the Catholic Church and the graces channeled by her, are staking the rightness of every collective decision they take on the rightness of the decision they took in 1980.

Do you really want these men and women to die with your wafers on their tongues? Do you really want them to die with their sins hinging on your faith, your theology, your sense of election?

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Easter Campaign:
Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($32,085 to go):
$80,000.00 $47,914.70
40% 60%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Think with the Catholic Leaders: Subscribe to Catholic Culture Insights Newsletter
Donate to Support this Site: Your contribution will be put to good work.
Tour the CatholicCulture.org Site
Shop Amazon to Raise Money for Catholic Culture

Recent Catholic Commentary

Learning from the sick, and from the death of a child May 17
The case for change in Irish abortion law: based on a framework of falsehood May 17
The Smell of the Sheep May 16
Too many missing funds: Catholic institutions need tighter financial controls May 16
What capitalists should learn from the Pope's critique May 16

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope strongly supports call for reform in religious life CWN - May 8