Times Take Two
By Diogenes (articles ) | December 13, 2004 9:27 AM
You can tell a lot about where a journalist is coming from by "asymmetry of identifiers." An identifier is a kind of tag that pigeon-holes a person, publication, or institution on the basis of ideology. A journalist writing for the public-at-large is ordinarily supposed to be evenhanded in applying identifiers. For example, if you tag Rep. Chris King, as "the right-wing congressman from New York"-- fine. But then it's only fair to identify, say, Maxine Waters, as "the left-wing congresswoman from California."
But when it happens that a group on one side of an ideological divide is labeled and the other not, the journalist has signaled that -- perhaps inadvertently -- he is writing only for those of his own persuasion. It's always "the other guys" who get the tags.
Now note that in the New York Times article mentioned below, reference is made to Phil Lawler as "editor of the conservative Catholic World Report," while Fr. James Martin, S.J., is identified as "associate editor of America, a Catholic magazine." See the point? According to the style-sheet of the New York Times, a bishop with more T-cells than teeth is "a conservative Catholic bishop"; all the rest are known as "Catholic bishops" or simply "bishops."
The same article, regrettably, identifies the Society of Jesus as "the largest Catholic order in the world." Public health officials take note.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($29,264 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Dec. 14, 2004 9:49 AM ET USA
Your analogy is flawless, but the liberal use of the conservative tag certainly alerts the conservative among us to kindred spirits. Those whose actions bring out the spite of liberals are my kind of people. Those who don't upset liberals are clearly part of the problem, not part of the solution. I do hope liberal ignorance concerning this helpful aspect of spite continues.
Posted by: News Hound -
Dec. 13, 2004 5:34 PM ET USA
Diogenes, I am one of those conservative journalists, which means I understand where leftwing journalists are coming from. They write from where they live. They and liberal academics breath a rarefied air that the rest of us do not have access to. We are the ones who are out of the mainstream. They simply report to their constituency, which is why they find it necessary to label us. But what the heck, I label them right back. Too bad I am retired.