Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

New York Times article on new missal translation

Catholic World News - April 12, 2011

The New York Times has published an article on the forthcoming revised translation of the Roman Missal. Quoting five critics and only one supporter, reporter Laurie Goodstein states that “thousands of priests” find the more accurate translation to be “awkward, archaic and inaccessible.”

The new translation will be implemented in the United States on the First Sunday of Advent.

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($26,216 to go):
$150,000.00 $123,783.96
17% 83%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 6 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: impossible - Apr. 15, 2011 9:28 AM ET USA

    Attacks from the New York Times and others outside of the Church are not nearly as destructive and worrisome as the attacks from within.

  • Posted by: AgnesDay - Apr. 13, 2011 12:30 PM ET USA

    Like I care what the NYT says about anything.

  • Posted by: hartwood01 - Apr. 12, 2011 9:27 PM ET USA

    We Catholics sure get a lot of press from the NYT. I'd say they were obsessed with Catholicism. Obsessed enough to present a distorted image, out of fear.

  • Posted by: BobJ70777069 - Apr. 12, 2011 8:50 PM ET USA

    Cincinnatus: "...that address only the translation are uniformly favorable." Favorable to what? - the Times position or the translation. I vote in favor of the new translation. (and I'm familiar with it.

  • Posted by: Obregon - Apr. 12, 2011 4:32 PM ET USA

    Gee, what can we expect from the ultra-liberal New York Times, a objective assessment of the new translation of the Mass?

  • Posted by: cincinnatus - Apr. 12, 2011 11:56 AM ET USA

    Reader comments to the Times itself are up to 130 and increasing. Most are the same kind of rants that are triggered by anything the Times writes about the Church. Those that address only the translation are uniformly favorable.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Denial of Service Attack: Success! 20 hours ago
Federal debt as a social-justice concern 22 hours ago
Another side of Francis: US-Cuba role shows Pope's diplomatic muscle December 18
Silly season: a Christmas approaches, a scholar questions whether Jesus ever existed December 18
The intrinsic immorality of torture: still not convinced? December 18

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis: Europe seems 'elderly and haggard' CWN - November 25
Pope Francis, Ecumenical Patriarch sign joint declaration, lament persecution of Christians CWN - December 1
Consistory for new cardinals scheduled for February CWN - December 11
Vatican report on US women religious calls for further self-assessment CWN - December 16
Pope brokered deal to open US-Cuba ties CWN - December 17