Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Irish nuns may face lawsuit over human vaccine trials

Catholic World News - August 20, 2010

An Irish religious order that operated maternity homes faces the prospect of a lawsuit over human vaccine trials that took place on babies there in 1960 and 1961.

Mari Steed, born at one of the homes and subsequently adopted by an American couple, discovered information about the vaccine trials as she searched for information about her birth mother. Steed’s birth mother says that the experimental vaccine was administered to her daughter without her consent.

Steed and three others involved in the experiment are contemplating a lawsuit against the Sisters of the Sacred Heart and are preparing a class action lawsuit against the drug company GlaxoSmithKline.

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our July expenses ($21,632 to go):
$35,000.00 $13,367.95
62% 38%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 3 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: extremeCatholic - Aug. 20, 2010 8:36 PM ET USA

    Wait a minute. The article doesn't disclose any injury suffered by Mari Steed and the birth mother may have given a blanket consent to the Sacred Heart sisters for care of her child. Wouldn't there be a statute of limitations on this in any case...

  • Posted by: stpetric - Aug. 20, 2010 7:33 PM ET USA

    Talk about piling on! After reading the linked article, it doesn't seem that Mari Steed suffered any ill effects; nor that these were experimental drugs; nor that she was traumatized by the trial. In fact she only discovered it, decades after the fact, by reviewing old records. The sole complaint is that there was no proper consent. The article doesn't say what the legal and ethical standards were at the time. This suit seems like trying to latch onto a church scandal with a contrived complaint.

  • Posted by: Don Vicente - Aug. 20, 2010 12:29 PM ET USA

    This was at approximately the same time that the infamous Tuskegee experiments were being carried out on adult African Americans here in the U.S. In Ireland, illegitimate babies; in the US, African American patients with a social disease: in both cases marginalized and voiceless groups of human beings, were simply used for the "good of the majority." The "good old days" weren't always so good...

Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Making Moral Progress? July 3
Vatican statement clarifies duties of Catholic faithful after Obergefell decision July 2
Political battles vs. sacrificial service: The Brooks paradox revisited July 2
A Baptist leader with a message the Synod of Bishops should hear June 30
'Helpful' advice for social conservatives: ignore causes, deal with effects June 30

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope approves process for holding bishops accountable in abuse cases CWN - June 10
Pope Francis’ 2nd encyclical released (includes link to full text) CWN - June 18
US Supreme Court rules all states must recognize same-sex marriage CWN - June 26
Archbishop Nienstedt, auxiliary bishop resign CWN - June 15