Cardinal Castrillon steps up defense of silence on abuse as new evidence emerges
CWN - April 23, 2010
Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, the former prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, has escalated his defense of a policy that protected priests from prosecution for sexual abuse. Meanwhile the National Catholic Reporter has unearthed evidence that Cardinal Castrillon pressured an American bishop to halt disciplinary proceedings against a notorious abuser.
In an April 22 radio interview, Cardinal Castrillon said that he did not regret writing in 2001 to congratulate a French bishop for not informing police about an abusive priest. He said that for a bishop to inform on a priest would be like a father testifying in court against a child. "Why would they ask that of the Church?" he said.
The Colombian cardinal, who has in the past charged that sex-abuse allegations have been exaggerated by the media, now implied that the victims' pursuit of financial damages had influenced the justice system. He said that bishops who defended accused priests were ensuring that "they were not, due to economic reasons, treated like criminal pedophiles without due process."
Cardinal Castrillon again invoked the authority of the late Pope John Paul II in defense of his attitude, saying "John Paul II, that holy Pope, was not wrong" to defend accused priests. He also said that then-Cardinal Ratzinger was present at a meeting at which the 2001 case in France was discussed, although he did not reveal what position Cardinal Ratzinger took at that meeting. Shortly after Cardinal Castrillon wrote his letter, Cardinal Ratzinger persuaded Pope John Paul II to assign supervision of all abuse cases to his Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
In a related story, the National Catholic Reporter found that Cardinal Castrillon, during his tenure as prefect of the Congregation for Clergy, had urged Bishop Manuel Moreno of Tucson, Arizona, to back away from his plan to suspend a notorious abuser, Father Robert Trupia. Trupia, a trained canon lawyer, had threatened an action for damages against Bishop Moreno if he was stripped of his priestly faculties. Throwing his support behind the accused abuser, Cardinal Castrillon directed Bishop Moreno to reach a mutually amicable settlement with Trupia.
During a long correspondence with Bishop Moreno about his status, Trupia had engaged in implicit blackmail, threatening to disclose his homosexual relationship with a deceased bishop.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($34,555 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: JR -
Apr. 25, 2010 5:56 PM ET USA
Such comments, if correctly reported, reveal great concern for the accused but disregard and contempt toward the victims. I doesn't seem the cardinal grasps the seriousness of the situation.
Posted by: Frodo1945 -
Apr. 25, 2010 9:28 AM ET USA
If the article in NCR is true, Cardinal Castrillon needs to go off to a monastery to contemplate his actions. I recommend that the fathers of the abused children get to visit him unchaperoned.
Posted by: New Sister -
Apr. 25, 2010 6:35 AM ET USA
raymond...I was thinking the same thing - can't see how a priest is more of a "son" than the young laymen victims.
Posted by: raymondfrice9926 -
Apr. 24, 2010 4:20 PM ET USA
Everyone knows that a father to son relationship is biologically, and sometimes emotionally based as well as psychologically . No way is the relationship between a bishop and priest the same. It is a contrivance that is bought about to achieve a goal. Cardinal Castrillon , in his defense of the French bishop, betrays his dysfunctional thinking.
Posted by: ma_judge -
Apr. 23, 2010 6:06 PM ET USA
It can be reasonably inferred that then-Cardinal Ratzinger asked to be assigned supervision of the abuse cases because of what he observed in the discussion with Cardinal Castrillon. The Spirit continues to move.
Posted by: Steve214 -
Apr. 23, 2010 5:40 PM ET USA
What is missing is the concern for the flock: he did not appear able to react as a healthy man does to the sexual abuse of minors.
Posted by: tim.moore1408 -
Apr. 23, 2010 5:19 PM ET USA
Too bad there is no offical "silencing"; someone needs to put a cork in the good Cardinal.
Posted by: John J Plick -
Apr. 23, 2010 12:37 PM ET USA
Cardinal Castrillon again invoked the authority of the late Pope John Paul II in defense of his attitude, saying "John Paul II, that holy Pope, was not wrong" to defend accused priests. And then, it would be logical to say that Benedict XVI, is "wrong" to discipline them? It is, (and was) NOT either/or... Any pope, unlike his Master Our Lord, is NOT omnipotent, he (the Pope) relies heavily on "his servants" to do the right thing... No Cardinal will be able to hide behind a pope...