Catholic World News

US bishops call Senate health bill ‘an enormous disappointment’ November 23, 2009

Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Centre, and Bishop John Wester of Salt Lake City are urging US senators to change provisions of the Senate’s health care reform legislation so that taxpayers and religious insitutions would not be compelled to fund abortions. The US Senate voted 60-39 on November 21 to permit debate on the measure.

“Thus far, the pending Senate bill does not live up to President Obama’s commitment of barring the use of federal dollars for abortion and maintaining current conscience laws,” the bishops write. “The bill provides federal funding for plans that cover abortion, and creates an unprecedented mandatory ‘abortion surcharge’ in such plans that will require pro-life purchasers to pay directly and explicitly for other people’s abortions.”

The bishops added:

Its version of a public health plan (the “community health insurance plan”) allows the Secretary of HHS to mandate coverage of unlimited abortions nationwide, and also allows each state to mandate such abortion coverage for all state residents taking part in this federal program even if the Secretary does not do so. The bill seriously weakens the current nondiscrimination policy protecting providers who decline involvement in abortion, providing stronger protection for facilities that perform and promote abortion than for those which do not. The legislation requires each region of the insurance exchange to include at least one health plan with unlimited abortion, contrary to the policy of all other federal health programs. Finally, critically important conscience protections on issues beyond abortion have yet to be included in the bill. To take just one example, the bill fails to ensure that even religious institutions would retain the freedom to offer their own employees health insurance coverage that conforms to the institution’s teaching. On these various issues the new Senate bill is an enormous disappointment, creating new and completely unacceptable federal policy that endangers human life and rights of conscience.

The bishops also called upon senators to “protect the access to health care that immigrants currently have and remove current barriers to access” and “include strong provisions for adequate affordability and coverage standards.”

Source(s): these links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

• U.S. Bishops Voice Disappointment in Abortion-Funding Provisions in Senate Health Bill, Urge Better Care for Immigrants and Affordability (USCCB)
• Centrist Senators Say They Oppose Health Care Bill (New York Times)

It's Your Turn to Sound Off!

» To ensure well-meaning comments, only donors are allowed to Sound Off.
  If you're a donor, log in; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Sound Off! Comments

• Posted by: filioque - Nov. 23, 2009 7:36 PM ET USA

  There are many reasons besides abortion why a Catholic should not support this bill: violation of subsidiarity, funding of contraception and sterilization, the fiscal irresponsibility -- we cannot afford this! Too many bishops are basically liberals who want to expand government to make life wonderful for everyone. They know they have to make a fuss over abortion but in the end they will be snookered: even if the final act doesn't fund abortion, Obama and the Democrats will fix that.

• Posted by: filioque - Nov. 23, 2009 7:34 PM ET USA

  There are many reasons besides abortion why a Catholic should not support this bill: violation of subsidiarity, funding of contraception and sterilization, the fiscal irresponsibility -- we cannot afford this! Too many bishops are basically liberals who want to expand government to make life wonderful for everyone. They know they have to make a fuss over abortion but in the end they will be snookered: even if the final act doesn't fund abortion, Obama and the Democrats will fix that.

• Posted by: Steve214 - Nov. 23, 2009 6:31 PM ET USA

  For most of the bishops, they would be overjoyed of the take over of health care by the Federal government--except for these few problems. But the Government is pro-abortion, and any health care program will, sooner rather than later, fund abortion. They don't seem to see that big government ALWAYS starts persecuting religions because government is a jealous god.

• Posted by: Minnesota Mary - Nov. 23, 2009 1:58 PM ET USA

  Do the bishops have any idea what the debt load of this nation is? Do they realize that we can't even pay the interest on the national debt? If this health care bill goes through, with or without abortion coverage, it will be the straw that breaks the camel's back and no one will be getting any health care, except for the very rich, because we will descend into the abyss of a third world hell hole! Black market medicine will be our only hope.

• Posted by: John J Plick - Nov. 23, 2009 1:12 PM ET USA

  Posted by: adamah - Today 8:19 AM ET USA "Disappointment". If my favorite sports team loses, it is a "disappointment." May God bless you a thousand times...! (How badly I needed to hear that from someone)

• Posted by: adamah - Nov. 23, 2009 8:19 AM ET USA

  "Disappointment". If my favorite sports team loses, it is a "disappointment." If millions more babies will be killed using taxpayer money and health care providers will not be able to opt out it is an "outrage" not a "disappointment."