Judge will hold Obama administration to its pledge to modify HHS mandate
CWN - January 29, 2013
A US district court judge has dismissed a lawsuit against the HHS mandate filed by the Archdiocese of Washington, Catholic University of America, Catholic Charities of DC, and two other local Catholic organizations.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee, ruled that the lawsuit was not ripe because the plaintiffs had not yet suffered injury. Citing similar rulings involving suits brought by Wheaton College and Belmont Abbey College, she added:
Moreover, the government’s supplemental brief in this case clarifies that “the regulations will never be enforced in their present form against entities like the plaintiffs in those cases or plaintiffs here and that defendants will finalize amendments to the regulations in an effort to accommodate religious organizations with religious objections to contraceptive coverage before the rolling expiration of the safe harbor begins in August 2013” … [T]his Court “take[s] the government at its word and will hold it to it.”
“The Court notes that it has construed the government’s representations as a binding commitment and it would not look favorably upon the government’s failure to comply,” Judge Jackson said in a footnote.
“The court’s ruling today places the onus squarely on the government to fulfill its binding commitment to address the religious freedom concerns of the Archdiocese of Washington, Catholic University of America and several other Catholic entities,” the archdiocese said in a statement. “This requires the government to revise its HHS mandate in a way that truly respects our right to serve all those in need without violating our religious beliefs.”
The archdiocese added:
Today’s decision was based on two commitments the government made to the court in this case and others: first, that the mandate as currently written will never be enforced against us; and second, that the mandate will be revised in a way that addresses our religious freedom concerns by March 31, 2013.
The court specifically noted that the archdiocese and its co-plaintiffs have the right to file a new complaint if the government does not make a meaningful change to the mandate by the March deadline. The court made clear that “it would not look favorably upon the government’s failure to comply.”
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($25,809 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: unum -
Jan. 30, 2013 10:31 AM ET USA
Win, lose, or draw in the lower courts, this dispute needs to be heard by the Supreme Court to enforce the First Amendment rights of all Americans, not just religious organizations.
Posted by: TheJournalist64 -
Jan. 29, 2013 7:33 PM ET USA
"Trust me," said the spider to the fly. . .
Posted by: Fiducia -
Jan. 29, 2013 6:26 PM ET USA
Too much focus on "religious organizations." Individual Catholics and other Christians have a right to run private commercial ventures without government mandates forcing them to choose between their livelihood and living according to their faith.
Posted by: Dan -
Jan. 29, 2013 6:22 PM ET USA
That's great, as far as it goes, but the judge and the Catholic institutions as plaintiffs miss a bigger point here: the mandate violates the religious liberties of ALL Americans. I fear the rather pusillanimous bishops will accept a "compromise" and declare victory while individual Catholics owning private businesses or not working for Church institutions are forced to pay premiums which pay for contraception today and abortion tomorrow. The Great Capitulation awaits.