Head of Pontifical Academy for Sciences says GMOs are step forward for evolution
CWN - October 15, 2012
The president of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences—an advisory body that is not part of the Church’s teaching authority—told the Synod of Bishops for the new evangelization that genetically-modified food represents a step forward in evolution.
After reflecting on scientific knowledge, evolution, and biodiversity, microbiologist Werner Abel of the University of Basel (Switzerland) said that “thanks to the recent advances in genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, it has become possible to direct biological evolution in order to better fulfill our needs for a healthy nutrition as a contribution to medically relevant improvements.”
“Our Academy concluded that recently established methods of preparing transgenic organisms follow natural laws of biological evolution and bear no risks anchored in the methodology of genetic engineering,” he added. “The beneficial prospects for improving widely used nutritional crops can be expected to alleviate the still existing malnutrition and hunger in the human population of the developing world.”
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($23,094 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: ebierer1724 -
Oct. 15, 2012 5:08 PM ET USA
The world already produces enough nutritional food, it's more a matter of getting the food into the mouths of those who need it. No doubt many people will see this statement as a vindication of bio-engineered food by monsanto, dow and others but does not actually address the inherent problems in allowing food to be modified under intellectual property rights and also require expensive and dangerous fertilizers and herbicides in order to complete this "step forward in evolution". It's not natural