Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $40,515 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Bishop Blair strongly defends call for reform of LCWR

Catholic World News - June 11, 2012

The American bishop who conducted a Vatican-ordered assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) has vigorously defended the results of that study, and the Vatican’s decision to undertake a major reform of the group.

Writing in his diocesan newspaper, Bishop Leonard Blair of Toledo, Ohio, said that many media comments on the Vatican announcement have been characterized by “distortions and misrepresentations of the facts.”

Bishop Blair emphasized first that the Vatican decision, announced by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), was not a negative judgment on the work of women religious in the US, but simply a judgment about the LCWR, a particular organization representing the leaders of many religious orders. “The biggest distortion of all is the claim that the CDF and the bishops are attacking or criticizing the life and work of our Catholic sisters in the United States,” he wrote.

The bishop went on to say that the Vatican’s concerns about the LCWR involved problems of doctrine and discipline, not engagement on social issues. Regarding his own involvement in the process, Bishop Blair objected to the use of the term “investigation” to describe his study. He explained:

“Investigation” suggests an attempt to uncover things that might not be known. In reality, what the CDF commissioned was a doctrinal “assessment,” an appraisal of materials which are readily available to anyone who cares to read them on the LCWR website and in other LCWR published resources.

Bishop Blair went on to cite several specific cases in which speakers at LCWR events, or the group’s written literature, indicated clear deviations from Catholic doctrine:

Bishop Blair questioned whether it is appropriate for the LCWR—a group that operates with the official recognition of the Vatican—to provide a forum for such dissent:

Serious questions of faith undoubtedly arise among some women religious, as the LCWR maintains. However, is it the role of a pontifically recognized leadership group to criticize and undermine faith in church teaching by what is said and unsaid, or rather to work to create greater understanding and acceptance of what the Church believes and teaches?

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($128,202 to go):
$150,000.00 $21,797.70
85% 15%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 4 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: lauriem5377 - Jun. 12, 2012 1:38 PM ET USA

    Lately, it seems as if articles of 'explanation' only confuse me more, but this explanation by Bishop Blair cleared up a lot of misconceptions about the LCWR issue. God bless this bishop for his courage and committment to our Lord's teachings and to the Holy Father.

  • Posted by: unum - Jun. 12, 2012 8:19 AM ET USA

    Bishop Blair is emerging as one of the "good guys" with the courage to defend the faith. We pray for more just like him.

  • Posted by: anne.mitzel3608 - Jun. 11, 2012 8:51 PM ET USA

    There were people at the Religious Freedom Rally in Toledo carrying signs that said "I Stand With the Nuns." At first I thought, "Great! I stand with the nuns too. Many orders have released statements condemning the HHS mandate." Then I noticed the acronym LCWR on some signs and wondered what the heck this had to do with religious freedom. Now I understand - they were just there to show their presence as anti-Catholic Catholics.

  • Posted by: TheJournalist64 - Jun. 11, 2012 7:56 PM ET USA

    It is clear why the congregations represented by this leadership group are dying: why would any orthodox young woman be attracted to even investigate a religious congregation whose leaders associate themselves with heterodox positions, even anti-papal ones?

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

When Catholics are less Catholic than non-Catholics 17 hours ago
Cardinal Kasper's nose is growing again October 18
Challenge Grant Begins as Synod Ends October 17
What's wrong with this Synod, IV: Unprepared for marriage October 17
No, mainstream religious orders aren't attracting vocations as fast as younger traditional orders October 17

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6