US bishops' accountability, 10 years after Dallas
CWN - June 08, 2012
Following up on his earlier analysis, David Gibson writes in the Wall Street Journal about the failure of American bishops to hold themselves accountable for their management (or mismanagement) of the sex-abuse scandal.
The best answer the bishops had to this in Dallas was a behind-the-scenes "fraternal correction" policy, by which a bishop would quietly pass along any concerns about another bishop to that bishop.
Unfortunately there is little evidence that fraternal correction has been administered.
Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Easter Campaign: Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($20,973 to go):
$80,000.00
$59,027.50
26%
74%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: FredC -
Jun. 08, 2012 5:42 PM ET USA
Once upon a time David Gibson was a great help to the Church. When did he run off the tracks? Instead of condemning all bishops, he might try to determine which bishops know of errant bishops but have not reported the errant bishops to the bishops themselves, the president of the USCCB, and to Rome -- in that sequence.
