Columnist proposes extra tax on contraceptives to remedy environmental damage
CWN - June 05, 2012
While the Obama administration argues that health-insurance companies should not charge women for contraceptives, a columnist in Forbes magazine makes a dramatically different argument: that women should pay an extra tax for contraceptives.
Tim Worstall reasons that the hormones contained in contraceptive pills eventually find their way into the world's water sources, with damaging effects on the environment--most notably a drop in fish populations. If manufacturers can be required to pay for the environmental damage their factories cause, users of contraceptives should pay for the damage done by the pills, he argues.
Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Progress toward our June expenses ($20,360 to go):
$30,000.00
$9,639.93
68%
32%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: rpp -
Jun. 05, 2012 9:41 PM ET USA
Makes sense to me, but goodness knows we should not ever do anything to discourage women from being, well, I guess I should not use that word. Let me rather say we must never do anything that would lead a woman to less available to scratch a man's "itch". Or so says the secular world of Obama. In all seriousness, it is actually a good idea.
