Gingrich issues contrasting statements on life at conception
CWN - December 05, 2011
After alarming pro-life activists with a public statement that human life begins when the embryo is implanted in the mother’s womb, Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich issued a statement on December 3 affirming that life begins at conception.
In an interview with ABC television correspondent Jake Tapper, Gingrich said that “when a woman has a fertilized egg and that’s been successfully implanted that now you’re dealing with life.” When Tapper followed up, asking the former Speaker of the House whether “implantation is the moment for you,” Gingrich clearly answered in the affirmative: “Implantation and successful implantation.”
The Republican candidate’s televised remarks shocked and alarmed pro-life advocates. Gingrich has a strong record of opposition to abortion, but his televised statement lent support to the argument commonly raised by advocates of early abortion: that a fertilized human embryo cannot be considered a human life in its earliest days, until it is implanted in the mother’s womb. That argument flies in the face of scientific evidence, since at the time of fertilization a new and distinct human life is formed.
Distributors of the “morning-after pill” have used the argument that Gingrich advanced in his television interview—that life only begins with implantation—to justify their claim that the pill is not abortifacient. And proponents of embryonic stem-cell research have used the same logic to justify the destruction of fertilized embryos. Although he told ABC’s Tapper that he was firmly opposed to embryonic stem-cell research, Gingrich seemed to be leaving the door open to such arguments during his television appearance, when he said that if human life is not defined as starting at implantation,”otherwise you’re going to open up an extraordinary range of very difficult questions.”
However, after pro-lifers reacted with shock to the former Speaker’s remarks, the Gingrich campaign issued a public statement that flatly contradicted his answer to Tapper. “As I have stated many times throughout the course of my public life, I believe that human life begins at conception,” the candidate affirmed. He went on to say: “My convictions on human life are longstanding, deeply felt, and irrevocable matters of conscience. I will do all in my power—always--to foster reverence for life.”
In his published statement Gingrich underlined his opposition to embryonic stem-cell research: “As I have also made clear in several of my public pronouncements throughout this campaign, I oppose federal funding of any research that destroys a human embryo because we are also dealing here with human life.”
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($27,446 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: garedawg -
Dec. 08, 2011 1:26 AM ET USA
Someone must have reminded Prof. Gingrich, a Catholic convert, that we soon celebrate the Immaculate Conception, not the Immaculate Implantation.
Posted by: frjpharrington3912 -
Dec. 06, 2011 12:23 AM ET USA
Since implantation of the fertilized ovum takes place several days after conception it is understandable that pro-life activists would want to make clear what science teaches, namely that implantation is another step in the continuum of life begun at conception. And Good for Newt Gingrich to have had this opportunity to clarify his position by confirming that life indeed begins at fertilization/conception.