thank you, Bishop Harpigny!!
By Diogenes (articles ) | Sep 15, 2010
Is a bishop above the law?
In the United States, a Catholic priest who is credibly accused of sexual abuse is immediately suspended. He is not allowed to wear clerical garb. If the evidence is clear and damning, he may be permanently dismissed from priestly ministry. He may even be reduced to the lay state—“defrocked,” as the newspapers put it—and the Church has nothing more to do with him.
When a bishop is credibly accused of sexual abuse, on the other hand, he is allowed to retire quietly. He retains his title and perquisites. He is treated with respect by his successors; he may even join them in public ceremonies.
Why do bishops escape canonical punishment?
Vatican officials explain that there is no effective provision in canon law for disciplinary action against a bishop. The Pope can request his resignation, but ecclesiastical courts are not set up to take further action against a bishop.
Well, if that is true (and I’ll defer to canon lawyers on that question), canon law needs to be changed—as indeed the canon law applicable to the US was changed in response to the sex-abuse crisis.
Bishop Guy Harpigny of Tournai, Belgium, has made this argument regarding the case of his disgraced colleague, Bishop Roger Vangheluwe. Yes, Vangheluwe has resigned. But Bishop Harpigny wants more. Laicization? Why not? An ecclesiastical trial? Yes. “But any signal would be a good one.”
Any signal, indeed. Even if a canonical trial is impossible, the faithful can still hope and pray that a few bold bishops will speak out to denounce the colleagues who have dragged our Church into scandal. For most of a decade, American Catholics have waited for a bishop—just one bishop!—to say something like this:
I am appalled by the example of Bishop X. He has betrayed us and harmed the Church. He is no longer welcome at meetings of our episcopal conference. He has stained the honor of the episcopate, and is no longer worthy to bear the title of bishop. I shall pray for his conversion, his welfare, and his salvation. But I can no longer consider him a colleague.
In the US, we’re still waiting. But now we hear something very much like that statement, coming from Belgium, where the outrage is still fresh.
Thank you, Bishop Harpigny. Your signal came through, loud and clear.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Sep. 15, 2010 7:54 PM ET USA
Ever since the "outbreak" of abuse surged to the media, I have humbly submitted my opinion that the worst damage is inflicted by the cover up rather than from the acts themselves. Cruel as this may sound, an abuse act can be healed when identified. But as long as there is a cover up, the original act continues forever and can never heal. Those who cover up repeat the abuse themselves. Diogenes is right in requiring action against those who cover up to their full responsibility as accomplices.
Posted by: tasha1996 -
Sep. 15, 2010 7:54 PM ET USA
Judas Iscariot, one of the apostles, betrayed Christ without repentance. The other eleven did not ostracize him; he eliminated himself.
Posted by: baltasa -
Sep. 15, 2010 7:04 PM ET USA
There is no punishment in the Cannon Law! What a lame excuse, the Pope has the power to punish him like sending him in seclution to a monastery to a life of pray,penance,poverty,and menial labor
Posted by: opraem -
Sep. 15, 2010 6:44 PM ET USA
under canon law the bishop is judge, jury and prosecutor for his diocese, so you're never going to get relief through that channel. in the us, 6 bishops resigned because they molested children and 1 because he killed a man. no punitive action has been taken against any of them. until benny publicly calls them on the carpet, his talk of reform is just hot air and empty promises.