Massachusetts: the limits of gender equality
By Diogenes (articles ) | August 23, 2010 4:49 PM
A Massachusetts man who showed an inordinate interest in a woman’s foot—if you really must know, the story is here—faces charges for “annoying a person of the opposite sex.”
Yes, there really is a law in Massachusetts that prohibits annoying a person of the opposite sex. This could be a shock to many grammar-school boys, although the statute is clearly not aimed at their antics.
To win a conviction, prosecutors must prove five elements beyond a reasonable doubt, the final of which is "that [the alleged victim] was a person of the opposite sex."
Two men or two women can be legally married in Massachusetts. But annoyance is still strictly a heterosexual affair.
[H/T James Taranto, Opinion Journal.]
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($21,364 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Cornelius -
Aug. 24, 2010 1:11 PM ET USA
"An act or language is offensive when it is contrary to the prevailing sense of what is decent or moral." The prevailing sense? So this act is as protean as the prevailing sense of decency and morality.
Posted by: michaelwilmes -
Aug. 24, 2010 9:20 AM ET USA
Since when has either "creepy" or "silly" stopped any of our clown- legislators from enacting laws?? The insane are indeed running the asylum.
Posted by: Wild Bill -
Aug. 23, 2010 5:20 PM ET USA
You have to admit that legislating to prohibit non-consensual licking of another person's foot is even more silly and a lot creepier.