We have $162,325 to go in our Fall Campaign. Every penny is used to strengthen the Church. See details!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

details, details...

By Diogenes (bio - articles ) | Feb 10, 2010

When he spoke to bishops from England and Wales on February 1, Pope Benedict warned that the Equality Bill, being considered in Parliament, threatened religious liberty. As he put it, the legislation would "impose unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs." In fact, the Holy Father continued, the proposal "actually violates the natural law upon which the equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed."

The Pope's words drew the wrath of the PC establishment in London. But they also rallied the opposition in the House of Lords, where Anglican bishops were instrumental in stopping the legislation. Now the Archbishop of Canterbury has offered his perspective on the debate:

It was over the question of how society identifies the point at which one set of freedoms and claims so undermines another that injustice results. As in fact the bishops’ speeches in the Lords made quite clear, (despite the highly-coloured versions of the debate that were manufactured by some) very few Christians were contesting the civil liberties of gay and lesbian people in general; nor should they have been. What they were contesting was a relatively small but extremely significant point of detail, which was whether government had the right to tell religious bodies which of the tasks for which they might employ people required and which did not require some level of compliance with the public teaching of the Church about behaviour.

So where the Pope saw a threat to the very foundation of legal justice and human rights, the Archbishop of Canterbury detected "a relatively small but extremely significant point of detail." The Pope spoke before, and the Anglican primate after, the debate in the House of Lords. Had the order of their speeches been reversed, the legislative outcome would surely have been reversed as well. Members of the British House of Lords do not allow themselves to become agitated about details


An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($162,325 to go):
$200,000.00 $37,674.72
81% 19%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Fall Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

What about Catholic affirmation for those in false marriages? 0 hours ago
Free eBook: Pope Francis' Catechesis on the Family 24 hours ago
The headlines say Gov. Brown is Catholic. He says he's not sure what that means. October 7
Archbishop predicts Synod won't change Church teaching. Why am I not reassured? October 7
A different tone at this Synod? October 6

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
In Cuba, Pope emphasizes service to the vulnerable, praises thaw in US-Cuban relations CWN - September 21
Pope challenges America in speech to US Congress CWN - September 24
As Synod opens, Pope calls on Church to defend ‘unity and indissolubility’ of marriage bond CWN - October 5