Off the Record

no PR chops By Diogenes | July 06, 2009 6:36 PM

 The Washington Post reported on July 2 that the release of Pope Benedict's social encyclical had been delayed until the week of the G8 meeting in Italy. That's quite true. Yet you can't help but wonder whether the Post really understands what's going on, because:

• The Post finds it significant that the Pope signed the document on one date (June 29), but the encyclical wasn't released until later. Actually it's customary for the Pontiff to sign such documents on a significant date-- in this case, the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul-- regardless of the actual release date. So now the reader is suspicious: if they don't understand Vatican traditions, can the Post reporters really understand Vatican intent? 
• The Post suggests that the delay can be attributed to the influence of "some PR chops somewhere in the Vatican." Now that suspicion becomes a certainty. If the Post thinks that someone in the Vatican is thinking intelligently about public-relations questions, then the Post definitely doesn't understand the Vatican. 

If you found this helpful, our bi-weekly Insights emails can notify you of key commentary items. Also, please support this apostolic work. Progress toward our February expenses ($12,051 to go): $17,000.00 $4,949.15 71% 29% Add Insights to your account. | Make a pledge or one-time donation.

It's Your Turn to Sound Off!

» To ensure well-meaning comments, only donors are allowed to Sound Off.
  If you're a donor, log in; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Sound Off! Comments

• Posted by: extremeCatholic - Jul. 07, 2009 7:58 PM ET USA

  One of my daily prayer intentions is for greater command, control, and communications intelligence on the media for both the Vatican and our bishops. This is Mt 10:16 applied to our times: "Behold I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents and simple as doves. "

• Posted by: Gil125 - Jul. 07, 2009 3:12 PM ET USA

  As they say on the Internet, LOL. To your second remark. How true! Alas.