Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

guilty/not guilty

By Diogenes (articles ) | Jul 05, 2008

From the Cleveland Plain Dealer:

A federal jury on Thursday acquitted the former chief financial officer of the Cleveland Catholic Diocese of skimming $784,000 from the church through an elaborate kickback scheme.

The jury did, however, convict Joseph Smith of lesser charges for failing to pay taxes on $171,000. Prosecutors claimed the money was proceeds from the scheme, while Smith said the income was legitimate compensation.

Remember this case? The diocese said that Smith stole the money. The defendant said he came upon the money legally, from some of the many off-book accounts that the diocese was using to throw money in all different directions.

The (presumably impartial) jury, after studying the facts-- which were complicated-- found that the guy cheated on taxes, but did NOT find that he got the money illegally.

So does the jury decision vindicate the stand taken by the diocese, or weaken it?

In a statement Thursday, the diocese said it accepts the jury's decision, "but it remains the Diocese's position that no one knew of or approved the payments to Smith by Anton Zgoznik's firm."

As I was saying...

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($15,164 to go):
$35,000.00 $19,836.18
43% 57%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Jul. 05, 2008 1:40 PM ET USA

    But the diocese also stated that it had received reimbursement for a large portion of "inappropriate payments" to Smith. Would those be payments from Zgoznik's firm that the jury did not find illegal? We will probably never know the whole truth of a most regrettable situation. Margaret

  • Posted by: - Jul. 05, 2008 11:17 AM ET USA

    ...gee, everyone won here: the I.R.S. found some money, the prosecutor got a conviction, the defendant was acquitted of the big crime, the diocese seems happy, etc....

Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Church Fathers: The Third Century and the School of Alexandria August 29
Every Aspect of the Catholic Thing August 28
News Posturing: How the dramatis personae use each other August 28
The intractable practical problems with the Kasper proposal August 28
No, the Pope did not endorse a gay-friendly children's book August 28

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis: welcome with compassion those who have remarried outside the Church CWN - August 5