good touch, bad touch, out of touch
By Diogenes (articles ) | May 30, 2007 11:24 AM
The Washington Post has an article on St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke, focusing on the rarety of a bishop "adhering to Vatican orthodoxy endorsed by Pope Benedict XVI" -- oddly expressed, but we all get the point.
The article never gets deeper than the surface antagonisms, but for a prestige media piece it's not grossly unfair in describing the range of opinion. Prof. Jim Hitchcock is quoted in Burke's favor:
Burke "has relatively little concern for, let's say, negative reaction," said James Hitchcock, a professor at Saint Louis University who writes for the diocesan press and calls Burke "a very humble man in his personal life."
"He sees himself as being obliged to do what he thinks is the right thing, and he's not too concerned with strategy or how he might finesse the thing," Hitchcock said. "There are quite obviously deep divisions within the church. Archbishop Burke is one bishop who has chosen to confront them directly, as opposed to other bishops who may prefer to minimize them."
Bull's eye. The key point Hitchcock makes is that Burke did not create the doctrinal divisions in his diocese (the Boston Globe runs the same article with the tendentious headline "Archbishop's Hard Line Divides St. Louis Catholics") but is candidly acknowledging their existence and taking up the unpleasant -- and neglected -- duty of teaching that some stances are not compatible with Catholic faith.
It's no surprise that apostate Catholics are unhappy. Journalist Peter Slevin identifies one of his critical sources as "a pro choice former Catholic," but fails to make it clear that Fr. Marek Bozek is likewise extra Ecclesiam:
The leaders of St. Stanislaus Kostka church know Burke's wrath. They ran afoul of the archbishop by insisting that their property remain independent of diocesan control, as it has for decades. Burke responded by evicting the church from the diocese and excommunicating the parish leadership, which has appealed the decision to Rome.
"From his point of view, we are nonexistent," said the Rev. Marek Bozek, the church's pastor. "I find it wrong to perceive the world in white and black colors only. Unfortunately, he does. And we are wondering why the church is losing its people?"
But when Burke declared the church out of line and parish leaders stood firm, membership more than doubled, Bozek said. And when St. Stanislaus celebrated its first Christmas Mass after 17 months without a priest, 2,500 people came. "From the purely pastoral point of view, it's been nothing but good for us," Bozek said. "It has revitalized the parish. We are growing because people can't stand this any longer."
OTR readers will remember that Bozek (pictured above) was a Polish seminarian with severe navigational problems who was slime-lined out of his native diocese to Springfield-Cape Girardeau, where he got in touch with his Inner Druidess, jumped ship to join St. Stan's, and has been celebrating a non-stop Mardi Gras with schismatics ever since. "I find it wrong," he says, "to perceive the world in white and black colors only." Enjoy your rainbow, pal.
In addition to the contrary opinions about Burke -- which are predictably, and plausibly, sketched in terms of the respondents' positions on unpopular Catholic doctrines -- there's a latent and unexpressed division at work: namely, between those who understand that Burke sees himself as answerable for his pastorship at the Last Judgment, and those for whom such a notion is meaningless or absurd. The latter group can only see Burke's positive support for embarrassingly unpopular positions as his giving gratuitous pain, and giving gratuitous pain is, for such person, not only senseless but wicked.
It is suggested in the article that both Burke and Benedict are, by virtue of their orthodoxy, "out of touch." There's a sense in which every man is out of touch with those who turn their backs to him. More pertinent is the question of what he finds it necessary to hold on to, what he grasps that he's never willing to let go of.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($26,930 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
May. 31, 2007 12:48 PM ET USA
there are those for whom"what he grasps that he's never willing to let go of" is a meaningless phrase. God help us when those who can't understand are in positions of authority. Thank God for the increasing number of good Bishops and pray for them all; their responsibilty is great. I'm thankful I don't have their load.
Posted by: -
May. 30, 2007 11:44 PM ET USA
Fr. Bozek can wear his pointed hat but I hope Archbishop Burke gets a red hat.
Posted by: -
May. 30, 2007 7:33 PM ET USA
Archbishop is a great bishop. We could use another 250 to 300 Archbishop Burkes. The CHURCH MILITANT has a real leader in the good Archbishop. Today is the feast day of St Joan of Arc; she was a member of the Church Militant as well. The Church is under attack and we need to fight back.
Posted by: -
May. 30, 2007 5:14 PM ET USA
As the old saying goes: "If you want to conduct the symphony, you have to turn your back on the crowd." Come to think of it, a nice metaphor for Ad Orientem.
Posted by: -
May. 30, 2007 4:23 PM ET USA
I pray that I may be "in touch" with the Barque of Peter that is now before us with Pope Benedict XVI at the helm and Archbishop Burke as the faithful navigator--both answerable for his pastorship at the Last Judgment--as are we for our "on-boardsmanship". If only there were more crew and less "captains" (see note on Tertullian toaday) who are untethered and out of reach of the pillars.