let nothing you dismay
In December of 1998, back when the war on Christianity was comparatively tame, George Will was inclined to dismiss the contras as a negligible fringe:
Christmas in America nowadays is largely an artifact of nonsectarian figures such as Charles Dickens, who poured a syrup of sentiment over the event, thereby making the fun of it accessible to all and offensive only to those who enjoy taking offense. This is one way a pluralistic nation accommodates religious differences -- by allowing some religious matters to be treated as desacralized bits of the common culture.
This "syrup of sentiment" has been considerably thinned out in recent years. New Agers, brights, sexual anarchists and abortion partisans (among others) have focused their hostility against Christianity with much greater intensity. Not only do they hate to see Christians enjoying themselves, but a natalist feast such as Christmas is particularly galling. Hence the ratcheting-up of the acrimony.
The new hostility is not entirely a bad thing. When the neutral ground -- what Will calls the "desacralized bits of the common culture" -- disappears, many people will be forced to consider deeply for the first time what their sentimental Christianity really means. Some will drop it altogether and join the contras, but others will be moved to take a stand, however modest, for the Faith.
In the case of the cruciform pendant on the necklace of that British flight attendant, anti-Christian controversy turned a piece of jewelry into a badge of conviction. By the same token -- trash that cliché; by the same non-token -- a number of half-Christian fifth and six graders, puzzled by the black-out on these particular carols, may ask about the meaning of the words and, in so doing, may find themselves re-examining their own commitments. Some will cave; some won't. Paradoxically, even the most saccharine Christmas carols and Christmas cards now begin to take on an edgy quality. Dead images start to live again. The prophet Simeon, looking at the newborn in question, told its mother: this is a sign of contradiction, a sword that will slice deep. Hidden loves and hidden hatreds will be laid bare.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($163,080 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Laity1 -
Dec. 20, 2006 11:38 AM ET USA
tonight, CNN will "catechize" us again: http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/presents/after.jesus/ the experts were carefully chosen did you know that Mary was "directly involved in the politics of her time"? http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/bestoftv/2006/12/19/significance.of.mary.cnn&wm=10 CNN will also let us know what Jesus looked like, and other such nonsense
Posted by: -
Dec. 18, 2006 1:42 PM ET USA
You mean that rudolph wasn't at the er... "feed box"?
Posted by: Deacon Bart -
Dec. 18, 2006 10:55 AM ET USA
The last day may or may not be close - I wouldn't know - but it does appear that the day of the nominal, lukewarm Catholic is rapidly drawing to a close. Praise God for those who wake up in time to take a stand and pray for the souls of those who no longer see anything about which to take a stand.