one of the saddest days of his excellency's life
By Diogenes (articles ) | Feb 21, 2006
Springfield-Cape Girardeau Bishop John Leibrecht tells the St. Louis Post-Dispatch of his efforts to prevent Fr. Marek Bozek from jumping ship to join the St. Stan's schismatics:
The 75-year-old Leibrecht said he feels a "personal betrayal" in Bozek's decision. On the morning Bozek gave Leibrecht his final decision, Leibrecht asked the priest to sit down and take his coat off. Bozek refused.
"I begged him not to leave. I gave him every reason I could think of," said Leibrecht, "but he made the decision anyway. It was," he paused, then began to cry softly, "it was one of the saddest days of my life."
Creepy. And it gets creepier.
Bozek, it appears, had begun studies for the priesthood in his native Poland but ran into an unenlightened superior with retrograde views about affective maturity:
Two years [after entering the seminary], Bozek was confronted by the seminary's rector at the time, the Rev. Jan Guzowski, and was told to leave the seminary immediately.
In an interview, Guzowski said some of Bozek's classmates had accused him of propositioning them. "When we did an investigation, we found homosexual pornography in his room," said Guzowski. "That was the last straw."
Bozek contends that the charges were unproven. His former archbishop, who (if accurately quoted) richly deserves contempt, slime-lined Bozek out of Poland to Springfield-Cape Girardeau:
In a letter of recommendation to the diocese, [Warmia Bishop Edmund] Piszcz wrote: "I know Marek would like to continue his formation for a priesthood and as his hitherto existing archbishop I give him my own recommendation."
He did not mention why Bozek left Hosianum.
"There is no reason why if someone is accused of something at one place they cannot go on to another," Piszcz said recently.
With an archepiscopal recommendation to hand, Springfield-Cape Girardeau can be excused for its initial blind date with Bozek; yet he seems to have been advanced unusually quickly (the vocation director received Bozek's e-mail of inquiry in Spring 2000, and he was ordained in 2002). Thereafter he enjoyed a brief but eventful career:
Bozek was assigned to be an associate pastor at St. Canera parish in Neosho. He spent about 18 months there before [Leibrecht] reassigned him to St. Agnes Cathedral in Springfield in the summer of 2004. Leibrecht said he'd been told Bozek was preparing to tell his congregation in Neosho from the pulpit that he was homosexual. Bozek denies it.
About this time you'd think Leibrecht would be at Bozek's door with a hypodermic dart gun and an immigration officer. Well, that's not the way it works, folks.
By fall, people in Springfield, including Leibrecht, were hearing rumors that Bozek was considering leaving for St. Stanislaus. But the bishop said when he asked the priest about his plans, Bozek always denied it.
Honesty, maturity, and vocational stability were not among Bozek's strengths. Fine. So what was? What "gift" did he bring to God's Holy People that out-weighed his manifest liabilities?
Bozek finally came to Leibrecht's office in early December and told him he was abandoning his vow of obedience to the bishop in order to heed God's call.
Ah. Discernment. Bozek had a direct line to the Holy Ghost. Perhaps that's why he left Leibrecht blubbering into his sleeve.
As Dom remarks, in spite of the swindle pulled off by Archbishop Piszcz, it's hard to believe the responsible parties couldn't see this coming. Are they bad judges of character, or perceptive judges with a weakness for bad men -- men the unenlightened faithful would call bad? It isn't easy to say. As so often in The Crisis there's an eerie disconnect between ordinary standards of accountability and the strange emotional currents that bind the clergy, that impede the obvious and necessary decisions from being taken. Leibrecht's tears are frankly weird, but it's telling that it was Bozek's "personal betrayal," not the objective leading of souls into schism, that provoked them.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Feb. 23, 2006 6:00 AM ET USA
Whereas Fr. Bozek claims, "obedience, thank goodness, is not the highest value. There are three other values that are higher: justice, truth, charity...", St. Thomas states that while Charity is a greater virtue because obedience flows from it, obedience "is more praiseworthy than the other moral virtues" (II-II 104a3). It also seems a little strange that Fr. Bozek speaks of obedience (as well as justice, etc) as a value rather than a virtue.
Posted by: JW -
Feb. 21, 2006 3:35 PM ET USA
jchrysostom, perhaps the bishop was weeping over concern for the soul of one of his priests?
Posted by: frjimc -
Feb. 21, 2006 3:21 PM ET USA
You know who his predecessor as bishop in Springfield-Cape Girardeau was, don't you? Think Santa Maria Maggiore...
Posted by: -
Feb. 21, 2006 1:25 PM ET USA
It seems that many bishops in the U.S. prefer this type of abnormal personalities to normal heterosexual, traditional men. How many times are good, normal, manly young men not allowed in the seminary because they are “rigid” “not in touch with their emotions” “not comfortable with their sexuality”? Why, God forbid, if normal married family men may become priests, that may ruin the “sensibility” and “dedication” of weirdoes like the one in this story. God bless true holy priests.
Posted by: -
Feb. 21, 2006 12:38 PM ET USA
Do you ever womder what is the source of our problems? Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops Bishops. If I were Pope, my only job everyday would be finding good bishops and removing or marginalizong weak, corrupt and evil ones. When that task was done, then I would write, travel, evangelize but not until then.
Posted by: -
Feb. 21, 2006 11:15 AM ET USA
Fr. Marek was also our asociate pastor for those 18 months (not St. Canera's, but a mission church associated). Let me jsut say that we had some doubts about Fr's emotional maturity and fidelity to the Church.
Posted by: Lucius -
Feb. 21, 2006 10:22 AM ET USA
This is why we need St. Peter Damian's approach to this moral turpitude:no compromise. The Church gets the benefit of any doubt about a candidate especially in the area of homosexuality. St. Peter Damian pray for us.
Posted by: parochus -
Feb. 21, 2006 9:16 AM ET USA
There's no connection between homogenital activity and a lack of fidelity to the Church. Right? Just as there's no connection between homogenital activity and sexual abuse with minors. Right? Right?! In space no one can hear you scream.
Posted by: patriot6908 -
Feb. 21, 2006 8:39 AM ET USA
This goes beyond being sick. It's sickening. Whatever sad internal narcissistic games these men play, they have no part within the Church. Maybe in a monastery of repentence and atonement, but please, God, spare us from this madness.
Posted by: -
Feb. 21, 2006 8:33 AM ET USA
What a strange story. Had it been a case of one grown man crying over another's personal rebuff, we'd probably conclude that the crybaby was merely a wimp, someone for whom the troubles of the world must not have been very great indeed, to provoke tears over something of no moment. Leibrecht's tears over the obviously homosexual Bozek's "personal betrayal," suggest a truly strange solicitude for the equally strange Bozek. Self pity? Abandonment? The loss of a really, really close friend?
Posted by: -
Feb. 21, 2006 8:06 AM ET USA
Diogenes, you don't need to be smart to cry about to evils of the age. Where vision is required is to be able to spot the presence God in every moment. When we succeed in this we can more easily fulfill St. Paul's teaching: overcome evil by good. Fr Pat Dowling