The Plaintiff's Attorney and the Sundance Kid
By Diogenes (articles ) | Jan 08, 2006
The "play now, pay later" legal maneuverings of Cardinal Mahony continue. The LA Times reports on the latest episode:
The Times reported Friday that Mahony and lawyers for 45 alleged victims of abuse, after three years of desultory negotiations, are moving toward a settlement that would pay an average of at least $1 million per claim. The settlement, if approved, would involve less than 10% of the more than 560 cases filed against the archdiocese, and would come almost entirely out of the archdiocese's coffers.
Mahony's lawyer said the roughly four dozen cases were selected for settlement because they are largely not covered by the church's insurers, which the archdiocese blames for stalling negotiations to resolve the bulk of the claims. Insurers have said the archdiocese forfeited its coverage by covering up the sexual misdeeds of its priests.
"We do not have the resources to settle more than these cases," J. Michael Hennigan, lead attorney for the archdiocese, said Friday. "We have always said that with respect to the other cases, that we believe we are adequately insured to cover the amount of the remaining obligation."
I fail to grasp the reasoning underlying Hennigan's confidence that "we are adequately insured," when those same insurers claim the policies are void and are suing the policy-holder. But the interesting aspect of this story concerns the dates of the allegations the Archdiocese wants to settle with cash:
The proposed deal would cover priests whose alleged acts of abuse occurred after 1985, the year Mahony became Los Angeles archbishop. It could put $1 million or more into the hands of the prosecution's key witness against retired priest Michael Wempe, whose lawyers have admitted that he molested 13 boys decades ago.
Last November we noted the equally curious coincidence that the 44 "representative cases" the Archdiocese agreed could be litigated in court date from 1958 to 1985 -- all of them, that is, before the time Mahony became archbishop. Therefore, none of the allegations that would be scrutinized in a public trial involve decisions for which Mahony was personally responsible. There will be big bucks to pay, of course, but we have the assurance of the Archdiocese's explicit hope that their insurers will, after all, do the right thing and pony up. And if they don't, well, whose fault is that?
A man less easily moved by episcopal suasion than your Uncle Di might reckon that this is the twofer the Archdiocese is trying to pull off:
1) The abuse that occurred on Mahony's watch (post-1985) will be settled, for cash, out of court. That means no trial, hence no senior ecclesiastics in the witness box, hence no consequent arraignment for complicity or perjury, hence no jail time for You Know Who.
2) The abuse that occurred before Mahony's time (pre-1985) will go to trial -- by an arrangement in which nine of the 44 select cases are agreed upon -- and whatever hit the Archdiocese takes will be financial. That means no senior ecclesiastics in the witness box (the relevant ones are dead), hence no consequent arraignment for complicity or perjury, hence no jail time for You Know Who.
The 560 as-yet-unresolved accusations will oblige the faithful to untrouser multiple millions, obviously. But isn't that a small price to pay, after all, for the privilege of a Pastor fearless in defense of the most precious and vulnerable truths of our Catholic faith?
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge goal ($25,000 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Fr. William -
Jan. 11, 2006 12:08 AM ET USA
It's one thing to eat & drink with sinners, & challenge them to conversion to the fullness of the Truth, & to speak & act as a successor to the Apostles. & it's quite another thing to actually imitate the sinners.... & to speak & act as a traitor to Christ & His Church & His Church's Teachings. What a horrible scandalous sight to see a cardinal doing the latter with baby killers. & the evidence of this statement begins with Cardinal Mahony's writings & how he offers his own version of Mass.
Posted by: -
Jan. 10, 2006 2:06 AM ET USA
A $45 million cover-up. Sure to follow is the argument that Mahony's correspondence with the disgraced priests, the disclosure of which has been so vigorously resisted by Mahony, is no longer relevant and should thus be returned to Pandora's Box. Disgusting.
Posted by: Vincit omnia amor -
Jan. 09, 2006 5:29 PM ET USA
must say he has good lawyers and a great PR machine... didn't Card. Law have to step down for this same baloney?
Posted by: Eleazar -
Jan. 09, 2006 11:35 AM ET USA
"1) The abuse that occurred on Mahony's watch (post-1985) will be settled, for cash, out of court. That means no trial, hence no senior ecclesiastics in the witness box, hence no consequent arraignment for complicity or perjury, hence no jail time for You Know Who." Since the settlements will most likely be sealed by the court, no public disclosure of the details or accountablity, either.
Posted by: -
Jan. 09, 2006 10:32 AM ET USA
For bachelor #2: "Sarò carcerato." Also useful: "Mi dimetto."
Posted by: benedictusoblatus -
Jan. 09, 2006 9:29 AM ET USA
Compelling analysis. Of course, it would all be a moot point if the Holy Father made the call. If the Holy Father lets his fingers do the walking, the Cardinal Archbishop of Los Angeles could be in Rome tomorrow - never to return.
Posted by: -
Jan. 09, 2006 8:57 AM ET USA
In fairness, should not the Cardinal consider implementing a FIFO policy for settlement of abuse cases. "First in, first out." That would lift any suspicion concerning his motives.
Posted by: -
Jan. 09, 2006 12:40 AM ET USA
Crass manipulation to cover himself. No care for the victims, no regard for the donors, no concern for the Church. HIM HIM HIM HIM HIM HIM
Posted by: Ross Dee -
Jan. 08, 2006 11:35 PM ET USA
How pathetic, so engulfed with the loosers. It is amazing that Cardinal Mahony would keep such close company with the abortion party. It certainly is not an honor to sit next to whatever his name is. This is a sad state of affairs. This picture says a thousand words and explains, a lot of, why the weak respones from the Catholic hierarchy in the USA.
Posted by: Gino -
Jan. 08, 2006 9:17 PM ET USA
Talk about "SLIP AND SLIDE"; the good Cardinal has perfected the art!