Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $38,368 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on

May I have the honour of the next, er, waltz?

By Diogenes (articles ) | Dec 07, 2005

There's been some lamentable confusion among the Blogvolk as to the nature of Boston College's controversial GLBT sock-hop. Enquiring minds want to know: Who leads?

To help bring clarity to this vexed issue, your Uncle Di refers you to an article titled "Using Students as Discussion Leaders on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Issues in First-Year Courses," which appeared -- I'm not making this up, folks -- in the Journal of Legal Education, Vol 49, Number 4, December 1999, pp. 535-544 (the swimsuit issue). The first paragraph provides a lucid explanation of pertinent terminology. I quote verbatim:

One of the authors, Nyquist, is a nongay white biologically male law teacher. Ruiz is a heteroqueer evolved male (the now-antiquated term is 'transsexual') Hispanic law student.(1) Smith is a gay white biologically male law student. Both Ruiz and Smith are active in the Les-Bi-Gay-Trans Caucus at the New England School of Law and have been involved in LBGT issues for many years.

This territory is sexually Abelian. That means LBGT^NESL = GLBT^BC. Footnote #1 explains further:

Ruiz prefers the term 'evolved male' to 'transsexual' as a description of his gender. He is a biological female who is in the process of aligning his body with his male gender identity. 'Heteroqueer' refers to Ruiz' sexual orientation; 'heterosexual' is too simple a term for his situation. 'Hetero' refers to Ruiz' attraction to women and 'queer' to his evolved-male status.

Well, they are training to be lawyers, after all. But we should reach beyond the lexico-sexual refinements to grasp the personal equation. Footnote 22 (p. 540) is illuminating in this regard:

When Ruiz first arrived at the school, Nyquist and Smith identified him as a lesbian. In our initial planning session for the class, Ruiz corrected us: 'A lesbian is a biological woman who identifies herself as a woman and is sexually attracted to women. Although I have a woman's body and am attracted to women, I identify my gender as male. ... The term I prefer, 'evolved male,' implies not only a physical transition, but also a personal journey, psychological growth, and a physical emergence. The term also serves to distinguish evolved males from biological males.

Clear, I hope? We've obviously come a long way from the ballrooms of Jane Austen. You might condense the information above into a crib card to help you navigate the shallows at the next college-sponsored dance you attend. When the heteroqueer evolved male invites the cross-dressing bisexual nestorian to dance, who leads? The one who paid less for his haircut.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($125,746 to go):
$150,000.00 $24,253.70
84% 16%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 3 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Dec. 08, 2005 1:21 PM ET USA

    A value is the number 3. A virtue is the Catholic doctrine. Value + Virtue = Schism.

  • Posted by: - Dec. 08, 2005 11:33 AM ET USA

    One does not need to read further than this (from the BC Student newspaper): "BC should follow Jesuit values, not Catholic doctrine." Can someone explain to me why the Jesuits have not been severely disciplined by Rome? Is there anything that can be done about what they allow to happen and/or promote on so many of their so-called "Catholic" college campuses?

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Dec. 07, 2005 11:05 AM ET USA

    An elegant demonstration of the sin of curiositas combined with Aquinas' aphorism, oft quoted by Mark Shea: "Sin makes you stupid".

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on

Recent Catholic Commentary

Ignatius Press into the Breach: Trumping the Kasper Proposal 12 hours ago
Has the Vatican finally discovered how to avoid inaccurate English translations? 16 hours ago
The Synod: It's a Wrap! October 21
A chaotic synod? Not in its results October 21
Cardinal Kasper's unsubtle threat October 21

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6