By Diogenes (articles ) | Jul 17, 2005
The Scotsman appends the last chapter to a pitiful story of a priesthood never meant to be.
[Archdiocese of Edinburgh priest Fr. Steve Gilhooley] makes no secret of his disdain for the new Pope Benedict, with his calls for a smaller, "purer" Church. "Makes me think of Nazism," says Gilhooley, who wants to reach out to as many as possible. And how can that happen with a pope who has called for prayers to be memorised in Latin? "I'm not going to say that I'm leaving the priesthood because a guy that I find objectionable has been made pope -- it's not that simple. But it helped."
Sexually abused as a seminarian and perpetually taut with anger, Gilhooley is at once an exasperating and a pathetic character. His autobiography (The Pyjama Parade) reveals an emotionally needy man of limited abilities whose convictions and intellectual outlook derive almost entirely from pop music. No philosophical or theological principle has a firm lodging in his mind. In their place is a frothing cauldron of resentments, in which hatreds surface and submerge with hopelessly incoherent rapidity. Some of these resentments stem from injuries he himself claims to have suffered, others seem imperfectly understood and borrowed intact from the erratic Leftist culture of pop music and movies. Most tellingly, in 200-odd pages he manages to evince no gratitude toward any person or institution and no positive enthusiasm for any endeavor -- human or divine -- with the exception of televised soccer.
Like many who collect and cherish personal slights, Gilhooley made a career of getting others to feel sorry for him. Perhaps that's how he got permission -- otherwise inexplicable -- to be ordained. He claims to have received death threats and even attempts on his life in retaliation for his candor, although it's impossible to believe that he didn't contrive them personally in order to assume a larger presence on the stage he built for himself. He clearly delights in persecution. Tireless in cataloguing the iniquities visited upon him, he is equally keen to record his acts of bravery: bold words, stunning ripostes, mighty prelates reduced to silence by an unwelcome truth from his lips.
He used to have an opinion column in one of the Edinburgh newspapers ("Steve Gilhooley: The Priest That Speaks His Mind"), in which he ranted against injustices of the right wing, striking a series of poses of righteous indignation. I found it as wearying as being trapped next to an angry drunk at a bar, but it must have gratified other readers, among them Archbishop O'Brien. Then too, Scotland has no shortage of anti-Catholics who would have enjoyed the spectacle of intellectual disarray at the heart of the Romish Church.
Recently Gilhooley went AWOL for a couple weeks (prompting fears of suicide), and resurfaced in Dublin, where the interview recorded above took place. He has now announced that he's leaving the priesthood. Having exhausted the repertory of dramatic exits with a series of door-slammings, it's his only stunt left.
Gilhooley's clown-on-a-bicycle act took place too close to ground level to call for grief at his falling off the vocational tightrope. It's neither comedy nor tragedy, yet. Among the many (ignored) warning signs in the story this one happened to strike me: when a priest gives voice to the belief that the teaching of Jesus Christ can be found in a purer or more reliable form outside the Catholic Church than inside her, he's in a state of free-fall. A crash is inevitable.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($1,438 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Pseudodionysius -
Jul. 18, 2005 5:47 PM ET USA
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit (no one provokes me with impunity)
Posted by: -
Jul. 17, 2005 9:00 PM ET USA
We need to pray for the conversion of Fr. Gilhooley. The Good Shepherd welcomes back the members of his flock who stray from the fold.
Posted by: Venerable Aussie -
Jul. 17, 2005 8:35 PM ET USA
Yes Pater Chrysologus, we need to pray for all our priests. But especially for those who used Sunday's Gospel reading on wheat and darnel to sermonize about the evils of "intolerant", "judgmental" Catholics (me, Diogenes etc). "What would Jesus do?" Well, he'd found a Church to .. "Sorry, wrong answer! He'd ask us to be tolerant. You see, only Jesus knows which is the wheat & which is the darnel." Got that Bishops & Cardinals! Don't be too harsh on priests like this Scottish dude.
Posted by: -
Jul. 17, 2005 7:10 PM ET USA
The conferring of the Red Hat on Archbishop Keith OBrien was a huge mistake. It was also an act of enormous injustice to Archbishop Mario Conti the Archbishop of Glasgow who is all that OBrien is not. Conti is orthodox courageous and a scholar.Why did this happen? The story will emerge in time.Its interesting to note that the Papal Nuncio who had such a part to play in this debacle (Pablo Puente) was recently retired to obscurity by the Vatican before reaching the mandatory retirement age.
Posted by: -
Jul. 17, 2005 5:28 PM ET USA
With a history of such actions so pronounced, public and prolongued, Abp O'Brien can't say that it was news to himself. But where does that leave O'Brien? He's not a teacher, nor a pastor, a counselor, nor even a lousy theater critic. Nope, in the Scottish Catholic theater, he is merely a theater go-er, an attendee who gets free tickets. It isn't just Gilhooley who is a pathetic character with no philosophical or theological principles.
Posted by: -
Jul. 17, 2005 4:51 PM ET USA
Could Diogenes, in relating the sad plight of Father Gilhooley, not have found it in his heart also to recommend this priest to our prayers? The Heart of Christ burns to repair and heal every priest damaged and broken by sin. Where are the souls willing to remain in adoration before the "Eucharistic Face of Christ" for priests, especially for those most in need of reparation and healing? Every "fall from the vocational tightope" calls for our grief because it grieves the Heart of Jesus.
Posted by: Ignacio177 -
Jul. 17, 2005 4:23 PM ET USA
I am amazed that Diogenes has time and patience to read such stuff.