Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

defamation

By Diogenes (articles ) | Jun 03, 2005

In October of 2003 some parishioners from a church in Merced, California wrote a letter to Fresno Bishop John Steinbock complaining of the misconduct and heterodoxy of their pastor, Fr. Michael Lastiri. The principal signatory received the following response from Bishop Steinbock.

I support Fr. Michael Lastiri as pastor of St. Patrick's. He is a good and dedicated priest, faithful to the magisterium of the Church, living a chaste and faithful life of a good priest. The people of God at St. Patrick's have been blest by his presence and leadership. It is a grave sin against justice to state, "The members of our Parish have been so long without a chaste and faithful pastor..." This is defamation of character. Please refer to the "Catechism of the Catholic Church" regarding this, paragraphs 2475 through 2479.

I certainly do not see in your letter the teaching and truth of Jesus Christ. I can only call you, and those who signed such a scandalous letter, to conversion to ask God's pardon and the pardon of your pastor whom you defame so maliciously. I will very much pray for all those who signed the letter, asking God to give them the grace to look within themselves to see how God may be calling them to conversion rather than simply judging and condemning others in generalities.

Don't be shocked, but eight months later Bishop Steinbock removed this same Michael Lastiri from his parish after Roman Catholic Faithful published screen-shots of Lastiri's numerous Internet solicitations for gay sex.

And last week it was revealed that a five-month audit of Lastiri's finances during his 20-month stint as pastor shows he misspent $60,000 -- including $19,881 in personal travel expenses.

Now think for a moment how much traveling -- personal travel, not professional -- a guy has to do to rack up 20,000 dollars' worth in twenty months. Lastiri must have been the pastoral equivalent of an absentee slumlord. And this makes Steinbock's castigation of the lay faithful all the more contemptible. The emphatic censoriousness of his reply could be justified only if he knew Lastiri supremely well or if he had conducted a thorough investigation of Lastiri's ministry and "lifestyle." Yet even a midweek phone call to the parish would have shown that there was no sense in which Lastiri's parishioners were "blest by his presence" and that there were serious problems to be addressed. The faithful were dead right. Steinbock was dead wrong -- and not only wrong, but acerbic in his contempt for falsehoods that were not falsehoods at all.

Before Lastiri's spiritual leadership became public ("big hairy bear visiting Vegas for a couple days of R&R...") Steinbock tagged his parishioners with the sin of scandal and called on them "to ask God's pardon and the pardon of your pastor." Having charged them with malice, and having failed to show a minimum of interest in their pastoral welfare, will Steinbock ask pardon of the faithful? I doubt it. After all, he wrote, "It is a grave sin against justice to state, 'The members of our Parish have been so long without a chaste and faithful pastor'." Most of us would think that this would be a grave sin only if the statement were false.

But then most of us aren't bishops.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($25,337 to go):
$150,000.00 $124,662.96
17% 83%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 10 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Jun. 07, 2005 12:44 PM ET USA

    Yes, I'm as confident as ever that homosexual priests/seminarians will be purged from the Church.

  • Posted by: Canismater - Jun. 03, 2005 6:13 PM ET USA

    Remember that the USCCB's policy to curb abuse is called something like "for the sake of the children", and powerfully targets all priests. Yup, the children need to be protected from the priests...but they have nothing to worry about from the Apostles of our day...by the way, can I date your daughter?

  • Posted by: - Jun. 03, 2005 5:55 PM ET USA

    Check out Fresno's diocesan protocol for bringing an allegation to the bishop's attention: http://www.dioceseoffresno.org/abusepolicy.html. It's minor victim specific and essentially CYA, with no correction to the quandary encountered by Lastiri's parishioners.

  • Posted by: - Jun. 03, 2005 11:32 AM ET USA

    This is revolting, but not surprising. Thanks for bringing yet another one of these stories to our attention.

  • Posted by: - Jun. 03, 2005 11:01 AM ET USA

    O.k, I read the rest of the story...once my eyes retreated back into my head, and I see that he was removed. Sounds like the real creep here is the Bishop. How do you get rid of a scoundrel like that?

  • Posted by: - Jun. 03, 2005 10:52 AM ET USA

    After reading the story regarding this sick creep and his felon boyfriend, I had to add something to my earlier comment, because this is not a matter to joke about...if I were a parishoner, I'd physically remove the evil hairy beast from the premises, and charge the Bishop's office or HIGHER UP and demand action. Scream and holler until you get heard and something is done. If that were my six year old, I'd be tempted to go for the throat. Bad things happen when good people do nothing!

  • Posted by: - Jun. 03, 2005 10:42 AM ET USA

    Welcome to Caleefornia!

  • Posted by: patriot6908 - Jun. 03, 2005 9:18 AM ET USA

    We can hope and pray that Bishop Steinbock repents and profusely apologizes. If St. John Chrysostom is correctly quoted in stating that the floor of hell is paved with bishops' skulls, then it would be extravagant to add one more.

  • Posted by: - Jun. 03, 2005 8:14 AM ET USA

    Plus ca change. This is the same kind of snotty, knee-jerk reaction of bishops to parents and victims who complained about abuse for decades (when they were not blaming the victims, a la Weakland...). And we expect the likes of Bp. Steinbock to clean up this mess...? He and his episcopal ilk are the problem!

  • Posted by: - Jun. 03, 2005 6:42 AM ET USA

    The Bishop's righteous indignation borders on being Pharisaical. I believe he is reading Sacred Scripture from the wrong point of view. Not quite what St. Jerome meant when he said every man should spend the end of every day reading It.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Denial of Service Attack: Success! December 19
Federal debt as a social-justice concern December 19
Another side of Francis: US-Cuba role shows Pope's diplomatic muscle December 18
Silly season: a Christmas approaches, a scholar questions whether Jesus ever existed December 18
The intrinsic immorality of torture: still not convinced? December 18

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis: Europe seems 'elderly and haggard' CWN - November 25
Pope Francis, Ecumenical Patriarch sign joint declaration, lament persecution of Christians CWN - December 1
Consistory for new cardinals scheduled for February CWN - December 11
Vatican report on US women religious calls for further self-assessment CWN - December 16
Pope brokered deal to open US-Cuba ties CWN - December 17