off the reservation
By Diogenes (articles ) | January 14, 2005 5:53 AM
George Weigel discusses the shock to the (British political) system provided by pro-life MP Ruth Kelly, and the paradoxically predictable reaction:
The Times of London summed up this change in the Ruth Kelly indictment by writing that "some MPs [Members of Parliament] fear her religion may cloud her judgment."
"Cloud" was the give-away, of course. In an objective news story, that sentence would have concluded, "...inform her judgment." But in the intellectually insular world of European secularism -- which has many parallels on this side of the Atlantic --- religious faith in general and Catholicism in particular are, by definition, obscurantist and irrational. How could Catholic moral theology "inform" anyone's judgment? Catholicism, according to the settled mythology of the Euro-secularist left, clouds judgment. Or distorts judgment. Or replaces "judgment" with robotic obedience.
We've seen this linguistic base-stealing in operation quite a while. If a man dissents from Humanae vitae, whether he's read it or not, he's a "thinking Catholic." If he concurs with Humanae vitae, no matter how deeply he may have studied the document and the attendant issues, he can only have "checked his brain at the door."
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($28,840 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Sterling -
Jan. 15, 2005 3:41 PM ET USA
Speaking of words, "linguistic base-stealing" is really neat. Diogenes, how do you do it?
Posted by: -
Jan. 14, 2005 10:06 PM ET USA
It has been going on for years regarding abortion: pro-lifers are always referred to as "anti- choice" or "anti- abortion", (even in our diocesan newspaper), while the anti life forces hide behind the "pro-choice" misnomer. Showing concern about illegal immigration immediately brings the label of racist. And those who recognize the Passion as a cinematic work of art are just ignorant religious right-wingers. Labels are powerful; their use can influence the shape of the debate. -Traditionalist