Endgame in Scranton
By Diogenes (articles ) | November 27, 2004 11:51 AM
According to a statement circulated via e-mail by Dr. Jeffrey Bond, Bishop Joseph Martino of Scranton, PA, has published in his diocesan newspaper a decree suppressing the Society of St. John, an association of traditionalist priests embroiled over the past two years in allegations of financial and homosexual improprieties. Concerning the latter, the decree (according to Bond) says:
Allegations of sexual misconduct against two members of the Society have caused public scandal. If the allegations are not true, there, nevertheless, have been acts of commission and omission by members of the Society in general that have given rise to these allegations and the resultant scandal.
The reference is to Father Carlos Urritigoity, superior-general of the Society of St. John, and his chancellor, Father Eric Ensey, who deny the accusations of misconduct. The background to the controversy is laid out with lucidity and balance by Rod Dreher in two NRO stories from 2002, one from February 7th and the other from February 15th. In the first story, we read:
Urritigoity has a strange habit of sharing his bed with seminarians and other young men, say [Dr. Jeffrey] Bond and others formerly associated with the Society. Bond and his lawyer provided NRO with two affidavits and a letter from a Franciscan friar, all of whom say they witnessed activities involving alcohol and improper physical intimacy among Society priests and young men -- including teenage boys -- in their company
As happens not infrequently, one's dismay at the accusations of sexual impropriety is eclipsed by even greater dismay at the reasoning offered in defense of the persons accused. In this case, Scranton's then-Bishop James Timlin told Dreher that, while it was true that the priests in question shared their beds with young men on some occasions, he was impressed with their alacrity when ordered to desist:
"When I heard that this was going on, I called the whole bunch of them [Society priests] in and ordered them to stop it," Timlin says. "They denied any wrongdoing, and said they did things like that only when they were crowded. They denied any immoral activity. I told them that they had to understand that in this climate, this is outrageous. You have to avoid even the appearance of evil." The bishop says the priests were "very obedient" and promised to stop.
Most wives will feel a twinge of sympathy for Timlin. Your husband overnights in a Las Vegas hotel on a business trip, and, due to a shortage of rooms, he is obliged to share his mattress with a cocktail waitress or exotic dancer. Happens all the time. It's not that he'd stoop to immoral activity, of course, but you can't help but wish he'd be a little more sensitive to the fact that, in this climate, you have to avoid even the appearance of evil.
It appears, however, that the judgment of the SSJ was found wanting in other matters as well. To return to Bishop Martino's decree:
Past financial decisions and conduct on the part of the Society of Saint John have caused grievous financial burdens for the Diocese of Scranton. These burdens include the Diocese being named in a civil suit for over $1 million and the need for the Diocese to secure a $2.6 million loan in August 2003, because of the Society's indebtedness.
Because of the Society's indebtedness? There's a lot that needs explaining in what is left unspoken here. Whatever connections existed between Timlin and the SSJ, Martino makes it clear that he wants out.
I hereby decree the Society of Saint John, Shohola, Pennsylvania, suppressed as a juridic person, a public association of the faithful, as of November 24, 2004.
We'll keep an eye on further developments.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our March expenses ($27,167 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: -
Mar. 21, 2006 3:41 PM ET USA
Ah, those evil traditionalists!
Posted by: Fr. William -
Nov. 28, 2004 10:00 PM ET USA
Gusguru, Actually, if only the bishops could publicly or privately call one another to such discipline: eg, calling for their brother bishops to be obedient to Rome and to the Holy Father and for the bishops to follow the Church and the Church's Teaching... and calling for certain bishops to step down from their sees when those bishops break communion with Rome...
Posted by: -
Nov. 27, 2004 9:33 PM ET USA
The Society of Saint John? Who the heck are they? And why are they riding so high in Pennsylvania? Around here (San Jose) all you have to do is make the sign of the Cross and you're marked as a Revert.
Posted by: -
Nov. 27, 2004 7:00 PM ET USA
This is great news that he supressed the order because of all the scandals that have come to light. Now why don't all the other bishops supress the rest of these dreadful religious orders (Jesuits, etc.) that are just as dreadful?