condomolatry again

By Peter Mirus (bio - articles - email) | Aug 16, 2006

This from Maggie Fox, Reuters health and science correspondent:
That said, [President] Clinton joined the majority of experts who say abstinence-only programs do not work. Better, he said, are programs that include abstinence counseling as part of a range of options.

Other experts have noted that abstinence-only programs have little meaning in societies where young girls and women are forced into early marriage, forced to have sex [forced prostitution], or raped.

Programs featuring abstinence and marital fidelity as primary methods do work, as experience in Africa shows. That is, these programs succeed in curbing the spread of AIDS. To date they have not succeeded in gaining the attention of the mainstream media, which remains obsessed with condoms. Some additional points:
  • Condoms are not foolproof. What’s foolproof is not having sex before you get married, not marrying someone with AIDS, and then being faithful to that person throughout your marriage.
  • Condoms have little effect in societies where young girls and women are forced into early marriage or raped.
  • Abstinence is always possible for those who are not being sexually coerced or assaulted. So what is the proposed audience for the condom campaign? Pederasts, pimps, sexual deviants, and rapists are not likely to listen to any such appeal
The United States wants to help those forced into prostitution:
A US law [requires] HIV/AIDS organizations that want PEPFAR funding to pledge to oppose commercial sex work.
This-- and a separate requirement that recipient organizations spend 33% of taxpayer funds on abstinence programs-- is viewed by critics as evidence of overweening moralism.
"I wish they would just amend the law and say 'we disapprove of prostitution but here's the money -- go save lives'," Clinton said.
Right. And then we're back to the question of how one can save lives more effectively: by encouraging abstinence, or by handing out condoms to clients at brothels.

Peter Mirus is a business, marketing and technology consultant who serves as a guiding member of the Trinity Communications Board of Directors. He has served as director of design and/or application development for many key Catholic projects since 1993, assisting such organizations as EWTN, the Knights of Columbus, and the March for Life. A specialist in non-profit organizations, he continues to work regularly on the design mission of CatholicCulture.org.
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 3 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: a son of Mary - Dec. 18, 2010 1:30 PM ET USA

    Every journalist I've ever met has been decrying the state of Journalism - it's been decaying for years. Formerly great papers, even medium sized city papers had foreign correspondents. Today there's just a few left. Nowadays the writing is terrible, little or no fact checking, and a lot of 3rd rate hacks bent on circulation not facts get into print these days.

  • Posted by: - Nov. 23, 2010 5:40 PM ET USA

    Since when was L’Osservatore Romano considered authoritative?

  • Posted by: - Nov. 23, 2010 4:22 PM ET USA

    Journalism, as we used to understand it, simply doesn't exist any more. No one in the main stream media takes the time to research anything, preferring instead to assume they know everything they need to know if they heard about it on Opera. The editors are so lacking in basic humanities backgrounds that they can't spot errors any more or even know what should be fact-checked.