Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Prominent New York ex-priest sues accuser for defamation

Catholic World News - March 30, 2011

A prominent New York priest who was laicized by Pope Benedict has filed suit against the man who accused him of abuse.

“When he made this accusation in writing, [a former seminarian] knew it was false, and he made it with malice,” Charles Kavanagh alleged in his lawsuit.

Kavanagh, who has maintained his innocence, once led Cathedral Preparatory Seminary, supervised the famed Alfred E. Smith political dinner, and oversaw Cardinal John O’Connor’s funeral arrangements.

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($27,707 to go):
$150,000.00 $122,292.96
18% 82%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 3 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Tex132 - Mar. 31, 2011 12:47 PM ET USA

    I don't understand people's sympathy for the priest. If he was laicized, by the Pope no less, he had to have been guilty of something. It's not a quick or easy thing for a priest to be laicized. If the abused was lying I'm sure the tribunal investigating the case would have figured it out. Yet, the priest WAS laicized AND reparations were made. I love the Church, am loyal to it and the Magisterium but am sick and tired of people blaming the victims and the media for the abuse scandal.

  • Posted by: filioque - Mar. 30, 2011 11:08 PM ET USA

    It's one thing to ask a court to overturn a decision of a church tribunal. That would be interference in the internal affairs of a religious entity. But when accusations are made publicly, why can't the accused defend himself with a suit for defamation? I really don't understand the decision in the Illinois case. Maybe it's just the Chicago way.

  • Posted by: dfp3234574 - Mar. 30, 2011 8:39 AM ET USA

    Good for the priest for taking the initiative, but if precedent is any indication, the court will not allow his suit to move forward. In 2009, when confronted with a very similar case, an Illinois court declared that such a lawsuit would "infringe on religious liberties." http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-06-11/news/0906100892_1_appellate-court-illinois-supreme-court-appellate-review

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Another side of Francis: US-Cuba role shows Pope's diplomatic muscle 4 hours ago
Silly season: a Christmas approaches, a scholar questions whether Jesus ever existed 4 hours ago
The intrinsic immorality of torture: still not convinced? 9 hours ago
The Complexity of Reforming Religious Communities December 17
Speaking Softly to Women Religious December 16

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis: Europe seems 'elderly and haggard' CWN - November 25
Pope Francis, Ecumenical Patriarch sign joint declaration, lament persecution of Christians CWN - December 1
Consistory for new cardinals scheduled for February CWN - December 11
Vatican report on US women religious calls for further self-assessment CWN - December 16
Pope brokered deal to open US-Cuba ties CWN - December 17