We'll receive a $25,000 grant if others match it by Pentecost. $24,025 to go. Your gift will be doubled!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Springfield diocese responds to Vatican decision on church closings

Catholic World News - February 17, 2011

The Diocese of Springfield, Massachusetts, has released a public statement responding to a Vatican decision that blocked the closing of three churches.

The diocesan statement noted that the Congregation for Clergy had upheld the decision to close 5 parishes, but had found that in 3 cases, “sufficiently grave reason was not provided to close each of these church buildings.” While the Vatican ruled that these churches should remain open, the diocese stressed, they will not be ordinary parish churches, and the bishop has the authority to determine how they should be used.

Bishop Timothy McDonnell is seeking clarification of the ruling, the diocese revealed, since the decision “seems to be undertaking a new application of church law.”

Earlier this week, members of the affected parishes announced the Vatican ruling, apparently catching diocesan officials unprepared. The February 17 statement from Springfield said:

Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, prefect for the congregation, has apologized to Springfield Bishop Timothy A. McDonnell for failing to present the decisions to the diocese before their public release.

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($24,025 to go):
$25,400.00 $1,375.00
95% 5%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: lauriem5377 - Feb. 17, 2011 8:51 PM ET USA

    Since both the Bishop and the parishioners had interests in this case (unfortunately different interests), I think they should have been notified at the same time. I pray for Bishops and parishioners to be on the same page - our Lord's page - instead of jockeying for power..........

  • Posted by: stpetric - Feb. 17, 2011 6:46 PM ET USA

    Why is Rome micro-managing the affairs of a local diocese? Without even giving the bishop advance notice, it's hard to see how Rome isn't undercutting his authority.

Matching Campaign
Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

A silent scandal: Catholic schools promoting morally unacceptable vaccines April 24
A More Militant Church? April 24
How we'll know if the Vatican and the US hierarchy are serious about deposing negligent bishops April 24
Final take on the LCWR: A time to plant, a time to uproot April 24
With the LCWR, has the Vatican taken Gamaliel's advice? April 24

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope challenges world leaders' silence on persecution of Christians CWN - April 6
Pope outlines plans for the extraordinary jubilee of mercy CWN - April 13
Vatican completes doctrinal assessment of Leadership Conference of Women Religious CWN - April 16
Pope accepts resignation of Bishop Finn CWN - April 21