Catholic scholars explain Pope's statement on condoms
December 17, 2010
In a thorough, balanced, and understandable analysis of the moral arguments surrounding the Pope's statement on condom use, written for Our Sunday Visitor, theologian Janet Smith agrees with Father Martin Rhonhemer that the Holy Father did not endorse the idea of accepting a "lesser evil." But she disputes the Rhonheimer argument that the Pope has opened a new debate on the morality of condom use, and cautions that his claim could be exploited by proponents of an agenda that is clearly at odds with the Pope's intentions. In making her argument, Smith sheds new light on several of the arguments about the Pope's statements and his intentions.
George Weigel adds his analysis in First Things. He explains that the Pope, in Light of the World, poses an interesting theoretical question about the use of condoms by someone whose behavior is undoubtedly immoral:
Might one find here a glimmer of moral insight, on the part of a habitual sinner, from which deeper moral insights into the evil in which he was engaged might emerge in time?
- A response to Father Rhonheimer on condoms (Our Sunday Visitor)
- The Pope, the Church, and the Condom: Clarifying the State of the Question (First Things)
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!