We'll receive a $25,000 grant if others match it by Pentecost. $23,735 to go. Your gift will be doubled!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Cardinal Ratzinger pushed for swifter dismissal of abusive priests

Catholic World News - December 02, 2010

In 1988, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger unsuccessfully sought changes to the Code of Canon Law in order to secure swifter dismissal of priests “guilty of serious and scandalous behavior,” according to correspondence published in the December 2 edition of L’Osservatore Romano.

The revelation appears to provide a direct refutation of charges that the future Pontiff had been lax in his response to sex-abuse allegations. In fact, Cardinal Ratzinger's move for stricter disciplinary action came more than a decade before the public exposition of the sex-abuse scandal. The New York Times notes:

At the height of the sexual abuse crisis last spring, Benedict’s defenders said he had long argued for disciplining priests who had been found guilty of grave misconduct, while other Vatican officials advocated more lenience. The new documentation is the most comprehensive made public to date supporting those claims.

Bishop Juan Ignacio Arrieta Ochoa de Chinchetru, the secretary of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, noted that in 1988, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith had the faculty of dispensing priests from celibacy and other obligations assumed at ordination. In a February 19, 1988 letter to Cardinal Rosalio José Castillo Lara, then president of the Pontifical Commission of Interpretation of the Code of Canon Law, Cardinal Ratzinger observed that some of these priests were “guilty of serious and scandalous behavior” and that the Code “provides for the imposition of certain penalties, not excluding the reduction to the lay state.”

“These measures, in the opinion of this Congregation [of the Doctrine of the Faith], should, in some cases, for the good of the faithful, precede the eventual granting of priestly dispensation, which, by its nature, is like a ‘grace,’” Cardinal Ratzinger wrote. “Some ordinaries meet many difficulties” in imposing canonical penalties on such priests because of the “complexity” of the Code’s procedures, Cardinal Ratzinger added, and thus he requested “more rapid and simplified procedures.”

Commenting on this letter, Bishop Arrieta emphasized that Cardinal Ratzinger felt “repugnance” that offenders should experience the return to the lay state as a “grace” of dispensation granted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith rather than as a “punishment” imposed by bishops and religious superiors.

Three weeks later, Cardinal Castillo Lara replied that the problem did not lie with the Code of Canon Law itself, but with the failure of bishops and religious superiors to implement the Code’s penal provisions. The cardinal noted that the procedures for dismissing a priest from the clerical state was simpler in the 1983 Code than in the 1917 Code and added that he did not wish to undermine “the fundamental right of defense” of an accused priest. Cardinal Castillo Lara bluntly concluded that in a time of “confusion of consciences and the relaxation of ecclesiastical discipline,” as in other times of crisis in the Church’s history, the Church’s bishops “have failed to exercise their juridical power to protect the greater good of the salvation of souls.”

Bishop Arrieta then noted that Pope John Paul II granted the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith more extensive authority in 1988 to punish priests guilty of “more serious crimes committed against morality” but that this authority had to be exercised within the legal context described by Cardinal Castillo Lara. The Congregation’s authority did not become “effective,” Bishop Arrieta commented, until the promulgation of new norms in 2001. These norms were revised in July.

Bishop Arrieta also revealed that in 1997, Cardinal Ratzinger successfully requested that the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples be granted greater authority to deal with “other types of disciplinary problems” in the world’s mission dioceses.

Over a period of 20 years, Cardinal Ratzinger has consistently sought the revision of the Church’s discipline of canonical punishments, Bishop Arrieta concluded.

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($23,735 to go):
$25,400.00 $1,665.00
93% 7%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Matching Campaign
Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

A silent scandal: Catholic schools promoting morally unacceptable vaccines April 24
A More Militant Church? April 24
How we'll know if the Vatican and the US hierarchy are serious about deposing negligent bishops April 24
Final take on the LCWR: A time to plant, a time to uproot April 24
With the LCWR, has the Vatican taken Gamaliel's advice? April 24

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope challenges world leaders' silence on persecution of Christians CWN - April 6
Pope outlines plans for the extraordinary jubilee of mercy CWN - April 13
Vatican completes doctrinal assessment of Leadership Conference of Women Religious CWN - April 16
Pope accepts resignation of Bishop Finn CWN - April 21