New York Times profiles rebel St. Louis parish
CWN - August 16, 2010
The New York Times has published a lengthy story on the conflict between the St. Louis archdiocese and the rebellious parish of St. Stanislaus Kostka. Although the Times story has no important new information, since the parish had turned down a bid for reconciliation with the archdiocese last week, the reporting does provide perspective on the struggle.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($26,054 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: extremeCatholic -
Aug. 18, 2010 1:32 AM ET USA
In a disputed meeting in the 1980's, by an amendment to the bylaws, the lay board asserted authority formerly held by the archbishop from 1891 to 1980. Ever since this was made known by the archbishops they have tried to restore their authority under the unamended bylaws. It would be the end of the Catholic Church in the US if hundreds of parishes "Bozek-ized" around their most popular priests.
Posted by: Lilacs2me -
Aug. 16, 2010 9:07 PM ET USA
I do not support (formerly Father) Bozek in his progressive vision of the church ala women & practicing gay/lesbian priests. Yet, why is it that after more than 100 YEARS, the archdiocese all of a sudden wants control of this parish? The only reason Bozek is in the picture is because St. Stan's has: MONEY!!! Obviously, everything was ok unti the sex abuse crisis came along.