Retired Dublin auxiliary raps Archbishop Martin's handling of sex-abuse controversy
CWN - January 27, 2010
A retired auxiliary bishop of Dublin severely criticizes the city’s current Catholic leader, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin, in letters that have been obtained by the weekly Irish Catholic newspaper. Bishop Dermot O’Mahony complains that Archbishop Martin failed to defend the bishops and priests of Ireland against charges that they engaged in a “cover-up” of sexual abuse. The retired bishop charges that Archbishop Martin—who was working at the Vatican during the years covered by the Murphy Commission report—was “unfair” in his criticisms.
Bishop O’Mahony took special exception to the new archbishop’s complaint that he—Bishop O’Mahony—had never apologized to the victims of sexual abuse. The retired bishop said that he had written an apology, but the Dublin archdiocese never made it public. A spokesman for the archdiocese confirmed that Archbishop Martin was aware of the apology letter.
The letters from Bishop O’Mahony—a rare display of frank criticism of one bishop by another—will be made public in the January 29 issue of the Irish Catholic.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($20,384 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: niall -
Jan. 28, 2010 7:28 PM ET USA
With all due respect,Raymond,Bishop O'Mahony was not waiting for retirement before criticising the Archbishop-he retired in 1996,7 years before Dr Martin came to Dublin.The focus of his criticism is the Archbishop's support of priests since the publication of the report-he can't be blamed for waiting until after its publication to make a judgement on the Archbishop's handling of it.The bishop acknowledged his failings,yet the Archbishop refused to publish the statement-this is unacceptable.
Posted by: raymondfrice9926 -
Jan. 27, 2010 9:41 PM ET USA
Dear Bishop O'Mahony waits until he is in a safe place (retirement)to launch his criticism. This is a sample of the lack of "guts" to do something effective and timely in critical situations that is found in our wimpy hierarchy!! God help us!!
Posted by: niall -
Jan. 27, 2010 8:01 PM ET USA
Thanks be to God for Bishop O'Mahony speaking out-although criticised by the Report,he issued an apology which the Archbishop refused to put on the diocesan website-shameful.Apart from anything else,the Archbishop's silence has been deafening-when he did speak about a certain bishop who has refused to resign,he blatantly misquoted this bishop & completely distorted what he had actually said.Dr Martin's cooperation with the Commission was laudable,but his behaviour now is utterly reprehensible.