UN panel grills Vatican officials on sex-abuse policies
Catholic World News - January 16, 2014
Vatican officials faced a “grueling” questioning on Church sex-abuse policies on January 16 when they appeared before a UN committee on implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
“The Holy See ‘gets it,’” Bishop Charles Scicluna of Malta assured committee members, who had aggressively questioned the Vatican’s commitment to ensuring punishment of abusive clergy. “There are certain things that need to be done differently.”
Bishop Scicluna, who for years was the Vatican’s chief prosecutor in sex-abuse cases, joined a Vatican delegation to the UN session that was headed by Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Holy See’s permanent representative at UN headquarters in Geneva. In his prepared statement to the UN committee, Archbishop Tomasi also tacitly acknowledged that the Vatican was late in responding to the sex-abuse scandal. But he said that the Holy See is now fully committed to the prosecution of abusers.
“Egregious crimes of abuse committed against children have rightly been adjudicated and punished by the competent civil authorities in the respective countries,” the archbishop reminded the panel. While emphasizing that the Vatican has no direct control over individual cases in the world’s dioceses, he said that the Holy See “has formulated guidelines to facilitate the work of the local churches to develop effective measures within their jurisdiction and in conformity with canonical legislation.”
“In the end, there is no excuse for any form of violence or exploitation of children,” Archbishop Tomasi said. “Such crimes can never be justified, whether committed in the home, in schools, in community and sports programs, or in religious organizations and structures.”
When UN panel members pressed for more details on the handling of sex-abuse complaints, the Vatican delegation repeatedly pointed out that the Holy See does not directly control the policies of individual dioceses, and said that the cases of individual priests accused of abuse, which come before the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, are treated confidentially. UN panelists were unsatisfied with those responses. “It seems to date your procedures are not very transparent,” said Kirsten Sandberg, who chaired the UN committee. The UN committee was monitoring the Vatican’s compliance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which the Holy See is a signatory. The committee has no enforcement powers, but is expected to issue a report and recommendations.
Speaking to Vatican Radio after the session, Bishop Scicluna admitted that the questioning had been “grueling,” but said that he hoped his delegation’s responses had answered public concerns. He again observed that local governments are responsible for prosecuting criminal activities within their jurisdiction. There is only one case, he said, in which the Vatican might be responsible for the criminal prosecution of a cleric accused of sexual abuse.
Bishop Scicluna was referring to the case of Archbishop Jozef Wesolowski, who has been accused of molesting boys in the Dominican Republic while serving as apostolic nuncio there. As a citizen of the Vatican, Archbishop Wesolowski could face charges before a Vatican tribunal. When questioned on the case by the UN panel, Archbishop Tomasi said: “It will be judged with the severity that the crimes might demand.” He declined to say whether the Vatican would allow extradition so that the accused prelate could face criminal charges in the Dominican Republic.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($2,050 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: dfp3234574 -
Jan. 17, 2014 3:36 PM ET USA
@atwood and @John ... No other organization has done more to combat a problem that took place decades ago than the Catholic Church. What is "insulting" is that the U.N. approached the issue as if the abuse of kids were still a problem in the Church, when, in reality, present-day accusations against priests are *extremely* rare, and almost *all* abuse took place decades ago. Try asking your local school district to put in the same measures the Church has, and they will likely laugh in your face.
Posted by: robertrees1422 -
Jan. 17, 2014 10:52 AM ET USA
I read with dismay this post about the Holy Mother Church going in front of the UN, which has been taken over by communists, islamofascists who worship the pedophile mohammand and the freemasons. The UN is as bad and corrupt as the obama administration.
Posted by: Thomas429 -
Jan. 17, 2014 7:48 AM ET USA
There are far too many member nations who's official policies advocate female circumsicion, abuse of young and old for sectarian reasons, and other transgressions against human dignity for any of them to speak against the church that had a small number of individuals operating counter to the church.
Posted by: John J Plick -
Jan. 16, 2014 10:08 PM ET USA
And what sophisticated pagan would be drawn to the Church after learning about such a thing as this?
Posted by: shrink -
Jan. 16, 2014 8:40 PM ET USA
The Church now grovels before the UN. The Church now answers to the UN. The Church now genuflects before the institution that epitomizes the culture of death. The Church now declares that the conscience of the world resides at the UN. Disgusting. Obscene. Unconscionable. Did Francis authorize this? Are there NO men left in the Vatican?
Posted by: hartwood01 -
Jan. 16, 2014 7:52 PM ET USA
"The Holy See gets it"? How insulting! How dumb do they think the public is?
Posted by: Mike in Toronto -
Jan. 16, 2014 7:19 PM ET USA
So the "UN panelists were unsatisfied with those responses," were they? And the Vatican is answerable to this panel because... ???