We must raise $2,033 by March 31st to pay critical bills. Essential to continue our mission. Donate now!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

New Mexico court declares constitutional right to assisted suicide

Catholic World News - January 15, 2014

Invoking the state constitution, a New Mexico judge has declared that the state’s residents have a right to physician-assisted suicide.

“This court cannot envision a right more fundamental, more private or more integral to the liberty, safety and happiness of a New Mexican than the right of a competent, terminally ill patient to choose aid in dying,” said Judge Nan Nash.

In December, the state’s three bishops had issued a statement in which they said they “strongly oppose any possibility of the authorization of assisted suicide by the state.”

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our March expenses ($2,033 to go):
$35,000.00 $32,966.87
6% 94%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 4 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: jimr451 - Jan. 16, 2014 7:00 AM ET USA

    I find it ironic that this "fundamental right" is always tied to a caveat that you must be competant, terminally ill, and of course a panel of medical experts must "approve" your petition to kill yourself.... If this right is so fundamental, why so many restrictions? Because it's really not that fundamental after all. It's another result of a nuanced view of the dignity of every life at all stages.

  • Posted by: feedback - Jan. 15, 2014 6:09 PM ET USA

    Basically what the judge means is, "this court cannot envision a right more fundamental or more integral to the safety and happiness of a person than the right to kill himself or herself." But with one's killing being "assisted" by other killer, who continues to stay alive after the killing, there are continued problems with the other killer's moral and legal standing, which could, in turn, adversely affect the co-killer's safety and happiness.

  • Posted by: Defender - Jan. 15, 2014 2:33 PM ET USA

    It sure must get hot in the Badlands of New Mexico. What other excuse is there for such tortuous logic?

  • Posted by: DrJazz - Jan. 15, 2014 10:27 AM ET USA

    How exactly is suicide integral to safety and happiness? Can anyone be sure that the dying person will be happy after death? And he definitely won't be unharmed, so just how will he be safe?

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Recognizing the Noonday Devil 0 hours ago
Patricia Jannuzzi on gay activists: And the real problem is? 4 hours ago
Surrogate parenthood = exploitation of desperate women 5 hours ago
Scientific Evidence for the Creator March 26
A request for help from our unregistered followers March 25

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope announces Jubilee: a Year of Mercy CWN - March 13