Down to the Wire: Just $9,218 left to match to win our Challenge Grant. Your gift will still be doubled!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

New Mexico court declares constitutional right to assisted suicide

Catholic World News - January 15, 2014

Invoking the state constitution, a New Mexico judge has declared that the state’s residents have a right to physician-assisted suicide.

“This court cannot envision a right more fundamental, more private or more integral to the liberty, safety and happiness of a New Mexican than the right of a competent, terminally ill patient to choose aid in dying,” said Judge Nan Nash.

In December, the state’s three bishops had issued a statement in which they said they “strongly oppose any possibility of the authorization of assisted suicide by the state.”

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($62,263 to go):
$150,000.00 $87,737.12
42% 58%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 4 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: jimr451 - Jan. 16, 2014 7:00 AM ET USA

    I find it ironic that this "fundamental right" is always tied to a caveat that you must be competant, terminally ill, and of course a panel of medical experts must "approve" your petition to kill yourself.... If this right is so fundamental, why so many restrictions? Because it's really not that fundamental after all. It's another result of a nuanced view of the dignity of every life at all stages.

  • Posted by: feedback - Jan. 15, 2014 6:09 PM ET USA

    Basically what the judge means is, "this court cannot envision a right more fundamental or more integral to the safety and happiness of a person than the right to kill himself or herself." But with one's killing being "assisted" by other killer, who continues to stay alive after the killing, there are continued problems with the other killer's moral and legal standing, which could, in turn, adversely affect the co-killer's safety and happiness.

  • Posted by: Defender - Jan. 15, 2014 2:33 PM ET USA

    It sure must get hot in the Badlands of New Mexico. What other excuse is there for such tortuous logic?

  • Posted by: DrJazz - Jan. 15, 2014 10:27 AM ET USA

    How exactly is suicide integral to safety and happiness? Can anyone be sure that the dying person will be happy after death? And he definitely won't be unharmed, so just how will he be safe?

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Art and theology, beauty and truth, work together in the New Evangelization November 21
Anatomy of Conversion November 21
Anatomy of Conversion November 21
It is a failure of mercy to deny sin November 20
Yesterday's news, tomorrow November 20

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days