Robert George, invoking Elshtain, weighs just-war argument for Syrian intervention
CWN - September 06, 2013
In an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal, the prominent Catholic legal scholar Robert George asks whether bombing Syria could be justified by the criteria of just-war theory. He answers the question, curiously, not by giving his own ideas but by speculating on how the late Jean Bethke Elshtain might have responded.
Elshtain, George says, would "not have accepted the isolationist idea that the use of poison gas or other means to murder innocents is none of America's business. She recognized that a powerful and prosperous nation bears great moral responsibilities that transcend its borders," George argues. He adds that Elshtain would have emphasized the need to ensure "the likelihood of improving, and not worsening, the situation for the people of Syria," and to guard against disproportionate force and harm to the innocent.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($29,259 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!