Federal court rejects Washington rules, upholds pharmacists' conscience rights
CWN - February 23, 2012
A federal judge has overturned regulations in the state of Washington that required pharmacists to dispense the abortifacient “morning-after” pill even if they had religious objections.
Judge Ronald Leighton found that the rules, established in 2007, were “not neutral” in their impact on pharmacists. “They were designed instead to force religious objectors to dispense” the morning-after pills, he ruled.
The judge observed that under the Washington laws, pharmacists could decline to dispense other medications, and refer customers elsewhere, if they found it economically inconvenient to stock certain drugs. He reasoned that pharmacists should have the same rights if they were motivated by reasons of conscience.
The Becket Fund, which provided legal backing for the successful challenge, said that the court’s decision: “sends a very clear message: No individual can be forced out of her profession solely because of her religious beliefs.”
Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Easter Campaign: Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($21,553 to go):
$80,000.00
$58,447.50
27%
73%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: n.gunther79030 -
Feb. 23, 2012 5:22 PM ET USA
Excuse me, but I feel a bit of irony in all of this. The liberals pushed a rule that had the weight of governmental coercion and would force Catholics and other Christians to violate their religious beliefs. They forgot to write it in such a way that scrofulous capitalists couldn't do exactly the same things, only they for cras profit motives. And so it was overturned. Love it.
