Obama's birth-control coverage decision shows special-interest bias
CWN - August 05, 2011
Columnist Timothy Carney argues that the decision to require contraceptive coverage in all health-care plans is a prime example of the approach taken by the Obama administration.
Although President Obama promised to guard against the influence of special-interest groups, this decision obviously serves the interests of two such groups: Planned Parenthood and its institutional allies, which distribute contraceptives (and can now bill for them), and the pharmaceutical companies that produce the pills, condoms, and other devices.
Meanwhile, the decision tramples on the rights of those who have moral objections--thus not only offending against the pocketbooks of taxpayers, but also their consciences.
Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Easter Campaign: Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($34,725 to go):
$80,000.00
$45,274.82
43%
57%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
