We have $161,839 to go in our Fall Campaign. Every penny is used to strengthen the Church. See details!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

The Father William Most Collection

Infallibility of Level Three Teachings

In Humani generis (DS 3885), 1950, Pius XII said that if the Popes in their acta deliberately take a position on an item currently being debated in theology, it is removed from debate, and falls under Lk 10:16: "He who hears you hears me". That is infallible.

But LG §25 seeming to speak of the same thing specifies only "religious submission", which is less than the infallible level.

We comment: If a Pope intends to make anything definitive, that is infallible. No special form of words is needed. Thus in the si quis dixerit... AS form, sometimes we find only disciplinary matters. While in Vatican I, DS 3006, we read that the books of Scripture have God as their author. But this was in a capitulum, not in a canon. Yet Pius XII in Divino afflante Spiritu EB 538, said that text of Vatican I was a "solemn definition".

We conclude that all that is required is the intent to make an item definitive, plus writing in such a way as to make that intent clear. The conditions given by Pius XII do make that clear, namely removing a thing from debate, and bringing it under Lk 10:16. Hence such things really are infallible.


Fall Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

The Synod Continues 13 hours ago
Why Pope Francis cannot win on sexual abuse 14 hours ago
A secret plot to control the Synod? No; it's not secret at all. October 8
What about Catholic affirmation for those in false marriages? October 8
Free eBook: Pope Francis' Catechesis on the Family October 7

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
In Cuba, Pope emphasizes service to the vulnerable, praises thaw in US-Cuban relations CWN - September 21
Pope challenges America in speech to US Congress CWN - September 24
As Synod opens, Pope calls on Church to defend ‘unity and indissolubility’ of marriage bond CWN - October 5