That's sooooo 1968!
By Phil Lawler (bio - articles - send a comment) | February 13, 2013 7:37 PM
If you read the Daily Telegraph interview with Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, you could be forgiven for thinking that contraception is the toughest issue facing the Catholic Church today. I’d phrase the problem somewhat differently. The toughest issue facing the Catholic Church today is the continued influence of prelates who think that contraception is the toughest issue facing the Church today.
Back in 1968, when the future cardinal was a young priest in the Portsmouth diocese, contraception was the issue on everyone’s mind: the controversial issue on which the Church was most flagrantly at odds with the popular culture. (And we can probably guess, based on his comments in 2013, what young Father Murphy-O’Connor was telling young couples at the time.) But that was a long, long time ago.
Today the burning issue is not whether married couples should use contraceptives. Western democracies are now arguing over whether homosexuals should be recognized as married couples, over whether abortion should be accepted as a form of contraception. (Pope Paul VI would not be surprised by these developments; he pretty well predicted them in Humanae Vitae.) In the eyes of the world, the argument over contraception is over. The goalposts have been moved, and the cardinal doesn’t seem to notice.
Rigid military establishments tend to churn out generals who are prepared to fight the last great war. Unfortunately the Catholic hierarchy has produced many prelates who are prepared to fight—or, all too often, to surrender—the last great battle.
The good news is that Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor is now 80 years old, and won’t be participating in the conclave that chooses the next Pope. The generation of clerics scarred by the battles of 1968 is passing from the scene, and a new generation, accustomed to sharper cultural combat, is arriving.
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Progress toward our June expenses ($13,107 to go):
$30,000.00
$16,892.93
44%
56%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: Duns Scotus -
Feb. 14, 2013 11:02 AM ET USA
jtlebherz3705, you think the good Cardinal arrived at his position through reasoning?
-
Posted by: jtlebherz3705 -
Feb. 14, 2013 9:04 AM ET USA
Phil, I must be the most naive person on the planet but I just cannot comprehend someone who, early in life, decides to become a priest, takes all of the neccessary classes, studies theology, philosophy and becomes immersed in the glorious history of the Catholic Church. And then, after an earth shattering encyclical (Humanae Vitae) for all to read, his opinion is what it is. The article cited is quite short so none of us get to peek into his reasoning but, I just don't get it.
