Critical need by 8/31:   $10,000 to cover a crippling immediate shortfall.   $7,705 to go.   Please help now!
Click here to advertise on

Advice for losers

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles - email) | Nov 12, 2012

Father Tom Reese is not infallible; he admits as much himself in a post-election column for the National Catholic Reporter. But he evidently considers himself a lot closer to infallibility than the American bishops, to whom he offers a great deal of advice.

”Here I am writing as a political scientist, not as a priest or theologian,” the Jesuit commentator tells us. Below the column, the Reporter identifies Father Reese is a Jesuit priest and a senior fellow at the Woodstock Theological Center. So the inattentive reader might think that he is writing as a priest and a theologian. But he’s writing exclusively about politics. Here, for example:

Banning pro-choice Catholic politicians or Catholic voters from Communion is counterproductive. Such banning is not the official position of the church, but enough bishops are doing it (and few bishops are criticizing the practice), that many see it as church policy. Any time you have to use power rather than persuasion in a political debate, you have lost.

Now only a few American bishops have said that politicians who support unrestricted legal abortion are barred from Communion. (To my knowledge, not a single bishop has applied that disciplinary action to mere voters who support abortion.) In every case, the bishops who have taken that action have made it clear that they have done so not for political reasons, but to safeguard the Church from scandal. A political scientist might not recognize the distinction between the political debate on abortion and the internal discipline of the Catholic Church. A priest and theologian might, but remember, Father Reese isn’t writing in that mode.

Which is reassuring, because it would be depressing to think that a priest or theologian would offer the sort of defeatist advice that Father Reese offers to our bishops:

If you know you are going to lose a fight, you want to fight in a way that does you the least amount of damage.

That advice might make sense if:

  • You are convinced that Catholicism is a losing proposition, but you have to keep up appearances; and/or
  • You don’t see any moral principles involved that are worth fighting for; and/or
  • You’ve never stood your ground, and you're not going to start now; you're simply too frightened to fight.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($18,254 to go):
$35,000.00 $16,746.18
52% 48%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Thomas429 - Nov. 14, 2012 9:22 PM ET USA

    This is good. Now it is past time to draw the line on governmental social engineering. . .

  • Posted by: Savonarola - Nov. 13, 2012 7:57 PM ET USA

    Good comment. You might have reminded your readers that Reese had to be removed as editor of America magazine.

Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on

Recent Catholic Commentary

Legal pressure does not make sterilization moral 11 hours ago
Just as you suspected, most polls are useless. August 26
Intrinsic evil can't be evaluated on a case-by-case basis August 26
'Catholicism by osmosis is dead'—Weigel hits the nail on the head August 26
Human Life is Family Life August 25

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis: welcome with compassion those who have remarried outside the Church CWN - August 5