We earn 8% in referral fees when you shop Amazon through our link. We make it easy! Click to learn how.
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

clarification of... something unclear

By Diogenes (articles ) | Feb 23, 2009

On Saturday the Vatican press office released a statement which I quote here in its entirety:

The communications media not infrequently attribute to the 'Vatican' - meaning by that the Holy See - comments and points of view that cannot in fact automatically be attributed thereto. In fact, when the Holy See wishes to make an authoritative announcement it uses appropriate means and methods (communiques, notes, declarations).

No other form of pronouncement has the same value.

Inappropriate attributions have taken place, even recently. The Holy See, in its representative institutions, shows respect towards the civil authorities who, in their legitimate authority, have the right and the duty to safeguard the common good.

Good. It's nice to have a reminder that when some enterprising reporter quotes "a source inside the Vatican," he might have been talking to the guy who sweeps the corridors, or a clerk at the Vatican post office. If the statement is authoritative, it should have someone's name on it. Fine.

Still we're left with a few questions: What statements have "even recently" been attributed inappropriately to the Vatican? What inaccurate impressions need to be corrected? Did some anonymous tipster commit an offense that, reading between the lines, seems to have involved disrespect for civil authorities? In short, what the heck are we talking about? 

(For the record, experienced Vaticanistas assure me that this controversy, if you can call it that, involves an obscure Italian political wrangle, which would have little interest for most English-speaking readers. That's reassuring, I guess-- although I can't help noticing that the press office provided a helpful English-language translation.) 

If the purpose of a public statement is to set the record straight, this one fails. When the "correction" is as murky as the public record it's intended to correct, it can only encourage speculation. Shall we now consult our favorite "source inside the Vatican" to explain what the press office had in mind? 

Clarifications, ideally, should be clear. 

 

 

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our March expenses ($28,832 to go):
$35,000.00 $6,167.70
82% 18%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

To talk of many things 0 hours ago
The stumbling block of morality on Self-Deprecation Day 1 hours ago
Opening Ourselves to Meaning and Purpose 21 hours ago
A thin-skinned Vatican spokesman harms his own standing 21 hours ago
Pope Francis prevails in Round I of battle for Vatican reform March 5

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis to address Congress in joint session in September CWN - February 5