Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

clarification of... something unclear

By Diogenes (articles ) | Feb 23, 2009

On Saturday the Vatican press office released a statement which I quote here in its entirety:

The communications media not infrequently attribute to the 'Vatican' - meaning by that the Holy See - comments and points of view that cannot in fact automatically be attributed thereto. In fact, when the Holy See wishes to make an authoritative announcement it uses appropriate means and methods (communiques, notes, declarations).

No other form of pronouncement has the same value.

Inappropriate attributions have taken place, even recently. The Holy See, in its representative institutions, shows respect towards the civil authorities who, in their legitimate authority, have the right and the duty to safeguard the common good.

Good. It's nice to have a reminder that when some enterprising reporter quotes "a source inside the Vatican," he might have been talking to the guy who sweeps the corridors, or a clerk at the Vatican post office. If the statement is authoritative, it should have someone's name on it. Fine.

Still we're left with a few questions: What statements have "even recently" been attributed inappropriately to the Vatican? What inaccurate impressions need to be corrected? Did some anonymous tipster commit an offense that, reading between the lines, seems to have involved disrespect for civil authorities? In short, what the heck are we talking about? 

(For the record, experienced Vaticanistas assure me that this controversy, if you can call it that, involves an obscure Italian political wrangle, which would have little interest for most English-speaking readers. That's reassuring, I guess-- although I can't help noticing that the press office provided a helpful English-language translation.) 

If the purpose of a public statement is to set the record straight, this one fails. When the "correction" is as murky as the public record it's intended to correct, it can only encourage speculation. Shall we now consult our favorite "source inside the Vatican" to explain what the press office had in mind? 

Clarifications, ideally, should be clear. 

 

 

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our August expenses ($15,070 to go):
$35,000.00 $19,929.98
43% 57%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Weep for slaughtered Christians, not for dialogue with Islam 0 hours ago
An Appointment that Francis Should Withdraw 23 hours ago
A new approach to Vatican appointments? August 28
The rising, dangerous influence of 'transgender' ideology August 27
Does the EU flag evoke the patronage of the Virgin Mary? August 27

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
‘A real via crucis’: Pope Francis, patriarch plead on behalf of Iraq’s Christians CWN - August 8
Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Christians in flight as Islamic State advances CWN - August 8