Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Explication du texte

By Diogenes (articles ) | Jun 03, 2003

This clause from Bishop O'Brien's plea bargain merits reflection:

During the course of the grand jury's investigation, to this date, no credible evidence has been received that would establish that Thomas J. O'Brien personally engaged in criminal sexual misconduct.

By this lawyerly phrasing we are free to infer that :

1. Evidence has been received that would establish that O'Brien personally engaged in criminal sexual misconduct, but the witnesses were not forensically credible.

or, 2. Credible indications have been received that would establish that O'Brien personally engaged in criminal sexual misconduct, but it doesn't qualify as evidence.

or, 3. Credible evidence has been received that would establish that O'Brien personally engaged in sexual misconduct, but such conduct was not criminal.

or, 4. Credible evidence has been received suggesting that O'Brien personally engaged in criminal sexual misconduct, but it fails [note the qualification "to this date"] to establish this as fact.

Is it possible that none of the above is true? If so, what conceivable purpose could there be for including such a sentence? This isn't the DA's press release, remember, this is wording agreed to by both parties, doubtless minutely studied by O'Brien's attorneys, and signed by O'Brien himself. It's unimaginable that O'Brien and his legal team would have consented to such a degrading formulation unless they were under compulsion -- i.e., unless the alternatives were even worse.

So what do we do now? The Phoenix DA -- and, with the DA's pistol to his head, the bishop himself -- have written in six-foot letters for all to see that O'Brien was an active homosexual whose cover-ups were a consequence of sexual complicity or blackmail or both. We can (and most will) continue to pretend that there is a more innocent explanation. If so, we'll hand another tactical victory to the Ziemanns, Weaklands, Ryans, O'Connells and other twisted bishops whose aggression and mendacity gave them decades of cost-free mischief at the Church's expense.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our July expenses ($15,467 to go):
$35,000.00 $19,533.29
44% 56%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Wanted: a balanced Catholic perspective on immigration 1 hours ago
Renewal with God before Us: Christ Determines All 18 hours ago
Sons of Dominic Prepare for Family Synod July 29
Dominican theologians assess proposals for divorced and remarried July 29
The ‘Pope Francis effect’—changing the way the world sees the papacy July 29

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
New management, new changes coming for reformed Vatican bank CWN - July 8
Sweeping reforms to Vatican's media, financial operations CWN - July 9
‘Even Genghis Khan didn’t do this’: Mosul emptied of Christians CWN - July 21