Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $41,010 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

to teach, to govern... or to duck?

By Diogenes (articles ) | Nov 08, 2008

Did you really think that the US bishops' conference was going to behave responsibly? What touching naivete!

In the heat of the presidential campaign, with bishops issuing contradictory statements on the responsibilities of Catholic voters and politicians, the USCCB announced that the bishops would discuss the topic at their November meeting, and try to achieve some workable consensus. That was then. Now the topic is off the agenda.  Sister Mary Ann Walsh, the PR director for the bishops' conference, explains that situation "has evolved since September" because many bishops have addressed the topic.

Yes, many bishops addressed the topic. And others didn't. Among those who did, the statements often clashed, leaving Catholics confused.  

So what has "evolved" to allow the bishops to skip another difficult discussion? Let's see:

  • Have prominent Catholic politicians ceased to be advocates of legal abortion? Not at all. This year's two most conspicuous offenders, Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, will soon stand 2nd and 3rd in line for the nation's highest office. They continue to advance not only the 'culture of death' political agenda, but also a skewed quasi-Catholic theology to justify it. 
  • Have the bishops reached agreement on how to handle the problem? Nope. Right through Election Day individual bishops were issuing their contrasting statements, drawing out different aspects of their malleable common statement, Faithful Citizenship. The most forthright bishops were acknowledging that an air-clearing discussion was overdue. 
  • Have the media moved away from the issue, now that the campaign is over, so that the bishops can retreat into undisturbed silence, away from the glare of publicity? Bingo.

A second question: A large minority (at least) of US bishops wanted to have this discussion, in order to achieve clarity in public witness. What's the argument against a discussion-- against clarity?

Finally what motivates the leadership of the USCCB in this case? The desire of zealous pastors to correct wayward members of the flock? The desire of dedicated teachers, to eliminate confusion and offer clear instruction? Or the desire of craven politicians, to avoid negative press? To ask that question is to recognize the answer.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($128,857 to go):
$150,000.00 $21,142.70
86% 14%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Cardinal Kasper's nose is growing again October 18
Challenge Grant Begins as Synod Ends October 17
What's wrong with this Synod, IV: Unprepared for marriage October 17
No, mainstream religious orders aren't attracting vocations as fast as younger traditional orders October 17
The Synod: Is the sky falling? October 17

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6