Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

what the archbishop didn't say

By Diogenes (articles ) | Sep 06, 2008

 Speaker Nancy Pelosi has accepted the invitation for a confidential chat with Archbishop George Niederauer, AP reports. The archbishop had said that he wanted to have such a conversation because of Pelosi's outspoken public advocacy for unrestricted legal abortion. 

Pelosi said in a letter to Archbishop George Niederauer that she'd "welcome the opportunity for our personal conversation and to go beyond our earlier most cordial exchange about immigration and needs of the poor to Church teaching on other significant matters."

With that letter to the archbishop, Pelosi-- whose political instincts are well tuned, to say the least-- is sending us a message as well. She has had conversations with Archbishop Niederauer in the past. They have spoken about immigration. They have spoken about "needs of the poor" (which, I'm guessing, might involve federal funding for the offices of Catholic Charities). They haven't, yet, got around to the question of slaughtering unborn children.  

Whose fault is that?

You might be tempted to think that Pelosi is massaging the truth about her past conversations with the archbishop. She isn't-- according to no less an authority than the archbishop himself. Niederauer specifically mentions talking with the Speaker about immigration because, you see, that was a "hot-button issue" at the time. 

Notice that when the archbishop finally said that he did want to talk to Pelosi about abortion, she answered-- positively-- in less than 24 hours. Her response time is a lot more impressive than Niederauer's; it took him 2 weeks to crank out a public reply to the Speaker's gross misrepresentation of Church teaching on a crucial public issue. 

So now we're left wondering what might have happened if the Archbishop of San Francisco had summoned Nancy Pelosi for a conversation about abortion a month ago, or 5 years ago, or when she was first elected to Congress in 1987. For that matter, we're left wondering how many other American Catholic politicians are still waiting for their bishops to summon their courage, clear their throats, and raise the issue for the first time. 

 

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our July expenses ($32,725 to go):
$35,000.00 $2,274.95
94% 6%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

Making Moral Progress? July 3
Vatican statement clarifies duties of Catholic faithful after Obergefell decision July 2
Political battles vs. sacrificial service: The Brooks paradox revisited July 2
A Baptist leader with a message the Synod of Bishops should hear June 30
'Helpful' advice for social conservatives: ignore causes, deal with effects June 30

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope approves process for holding bishops accountable in abuse cases CWN - June 10
Pope Francis’ 2nd encyclical released (includes link to full text) CWN - June 18
US Supreme Court rules all states must recognize same-sex marriage CWN - June 26
Archbishop Nienstedt, auxiliary bishop resign CWN - June 15